Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York has introduced a bill
to the U.S. House of Representatives that would, if enacted, bring rent
control — traditionally a local and state matter — to the federal level.
It would bring some form of rent control to the vast majority of places
nationwide that do not have it.
What’s In AOC’s National Rent Control Proposal
The bill, formally known as “A Just Society: A Place to Prosper Act
of 2019,” would establish a national cap on annual rent increases,
restrict evictions and guarantee right to counsel for tenants facing
eviction.
Specifically, the Place to Prosper Act calls for a cap of 3% or the
annual U.S. Consumer Price Index increase, whichever is greater, for
rents in housing markets nationwide.
Small-scale landlords (those with fewer than five units) would be
excluded. Even so, that is a tighter standard than provided for in a new
state rent control law awaiting the governor’s signature in California,
City Lab reports. California’s law will limit annual rent increases to
5% a year plus the consumer price index, but no more than 10% annually.
It also requires landlords to cite “just cause” for evicting a tenant,
such as failing to pay rent or damaging the property.
Oregon’s statewide cap on rent increases, passed earlier this year, is 7% plus inflation.
Ocasio-Cortez’s bill would also make public data that has been
previously been the private domain of landlords. Namely, it would force
large apartment landlords — those who own 100 or more units in a single
market — to disclose their eviction rates, median rental rates, how many
and what kind of code violations their properties have incurred, and
other data points.
The measure would make it illegal for landlords to discriminate
against potential tenants who receive federal housing assistance. Also
under the bill, the Department of Housing and Urban Development would
oversee a grant program to fund state and local programs offering
counsel for tenants in their eviction proceedings.
The Place to Prosper Act also aims to influence local zoning codes
by holding back highway funds for jurisdictions not supporting
“equitable development,” and increasing them for those supporting
equitable development. A number of criteria in the bill define equitable
development, such as streamlining the approval processes for affordable
developments.
Though there is no chance that any of the AOC bills will pass the
current Congress — setting aside the impeachment inquiry and the
upcoming presidential election, Republicans control the Senate and would
oppose the policies — they are seen by supporters and opponents as
moving rent control further into the realm of possibility, for good or
ill. As populations in the world’s cities swell and housing costs
spiral, rent control is being heralded as the answer by many housing
advocates and politicians.
“We can … build popular support in acknowledging how bad the
problem already is. In doing so, we can actually begin to fundamentally
address those problems,” Ocasio-Cortez told NPR.
“The economists are right, and the populists are wrong,” the
Washington Post wrote in an editorial. “Rent-control laws can be good
for some privileged beneficiaries, who are often not the people who
really need help. But they are bad for many others.”
In Ocasio-Cortez’s home of New York, where progressive Democrats
passed a sweeping update to the state’s rent regulations, apartment
landlords have called the measures “devastating” and “irresponsible,”
and real estate groups are suing to try to overturn the laws in federal
court.
https://www.bisnow.com/national/news/multifamily/whats-in-aocs-national-rent-control-proposal-101041
No comments:
Post a Comment