Search This Blog

Sunday, September 27, 2026

'Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. changes corporate name again, relocates headquarters'

 

  • Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. is changing its corporate name to Neighborhood Intelligence and will begin trading on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol NXH, effective Aug. 17. As a result, the company’s last day trading on the New York Stock Exchange will be Aug. 14.
  • The company is also relocating its headquarters from Murray, Utah, to Nashville, Tennessee, according to a Tuesday announcement.
  • The changes underscore the company’s three-pillared turnaround strategy, focused on omnichannel retail and commerce; digital, financial, insurance and blockchain services; and beyond home, which includes an AI-powered home operating system.

The corporate name change and headquarters relocation mark the latest moves from the company to establish the next era of Bed Bath & Beyond.

CEO Marcus Lemonis reiterated the company’s ambitions to move beyond being a retailer, hoping to be a part of customers’ lives in every aspect of their home — from flooring to insurance.

“Retail can only introduce us to the customer. Home services allow us to deepen that trust. Quite frankly, it’s where the real margin exists,” Lemonis said on a call with analysts Tuesday. “When a customer invites us across the threshold, they’re trusting us with an expansive and disruptive project inside of their home where their families live.” 

Lemonis called out recent acquisitions — like Closet Works and Lumber Liquidators, as well as real estate brokerage firm Fathom — as helping it to build out the service component for customers.

The company’s plan to expand beyond retail has “some merit,” according to GlobalData Managing Director Neil Saunders. “We are concerned that the vision is too lofty in aspiration and too lacking in detail and precision. And ultimately, that might prove its undoing – especially in terms of how it’s presented to the customer,” he said.

Bed Bath & Beyond on Tuesday also reported second quarter earnings results. Revenue in the period increased 28% year over year to $361 million, which the company said marks its second consecutive quarter of year-over-year revenue growth after 19 quarters of declines.

“While two quarters are not a victory, and the work is far from finished, what matters is that the operating model is now producing measurable evidence that it is working — revenue growth, order growth, margin expansion and early integration results from the businesses we’ve acquired,” Lemonis said.

Though much of that growth is thanks to the acquisitions Bed Bath & Beyond made, particularly the deal to acquire The Brand House Collective (formerly Kirkland’s Home), which closed in the second quarter.

Last year, when The Brand House Collective was a stand-alone business, the company reported Q2 2025 net sales of $75.8 million. “If that’s factored in, growth for the two combined businesses comes in at a much less impressive 0.9% on a simple pro forma basis,” Saunders said in emailed comments. “The periods are not perfectly aligned, but the calculation provides a much better indication of the underlying performance which, honestly, isn’t all that impressive given it comes in below overall market growth.”

The recent acquisitions also increased the company’s active customer base to 6.4 million, up 47% year over year, and orders delivered to 2.8 million. But Bed Bath & Beyond’s net loss expanded in the quarter, reaching $39 million from $19 million a year ago.

“The proof point in whether this vision can successfully come to life will ultimately come from being able to generate sustained top line growth with some good profitability – which will also rely on finding high synergistic cost savings,” Saunders said.

Looking ahead, the company expects Q3 revenue to be between $505 million and $525 million, with margins expected to be around 30%.

https://www.retaildive.com/news/bed-bath-beyond-corporate-name-neighborhood-intelligence-headquarters-second-quarter-earnings/827083/

Saturday, September 26, 2026

The Commercial Real Estate Crash Is Moving From Paper Losses To Realized Losses

 The great commercial real estate waiting game may finally be running out of time, according to Bloomberg.

For years after Covid fundamentally changed how Americans use office space, lenders and property owners managed to postpone much of the financial damage. Loans were modified, maturities were pushed out and buildings were given more time to recover. The basic assumption was that eventually interest rates would come down, employees would spend more time downtown and refinancing markets would reopen.

Instead, many owners are reaching the end of the runway with rates still elevated and buildings worth dramatically less than the debt sitting against them.

Chicago’s Aon Center offers an almost absurd illustration. The 83-story skyscraper changed hands for $712 million in 2015 and was subsequently refinanced, with $536 million of debt eventually packaged into commercial mortgage-backed securities. Today, after losing important tenants, the building is worth nowhere near that amount. Its latest appraisal came in at just $195 million — a decline of roughly 73% from its 2015 purchase price.

Bloomberg writes that when the debt matured in July, the owner couldn’t repay it and sought another three years to sort things out. This time the lender wasn’t interested. The request was “unequivocally denied.”

Situations like this are beginning to pile up across the country. Office loans packaged into CMBS are now delinquent at a 12% rate, according to Trepp. That puts distress near an all-time high and, remarkably, beyond the levels seen in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. Meanwhile, approximately $64 billion of office CMBS loans come due this year and next. Nearly $40 billion of that pile is already delinquent, in default or flagged as potentially troubled.

But this isn’t one uniform nationwide office collapse.

New York has been surprisingly resilient, with finance, law and technology companies still competing for desirable space. San Francisco, despite enormous problems left over from the pandemic, has received a new source of demand from the AI boom.

Other cities have considerably less working in their favor. Chicago’s downtown office vacancy rate is roughly 27%. Denver’s has reached an astonishing 39%. Los Angeles and several other downtown markets are also struggling, especially in areas dominated by older office stock.

There’s also increasingly a tale of two office markets within individual cities. Companies willing to spend money on office space generally want newer buildings, good locations and modern amenities. That leaves yesterday’s Class B towers fighting over a shrinking pool of tenants while their economics deteriorate.

And some of the repricing has been brutal.

Denver’s Republic Plaza has lost roughly 80% of its value compared with when Brookfield financed the property in 2012. Chicago’s Citadel Center recently changed hands for $137 million, approximately 76% below what the building sold for in 2006. The situation is bad enough that CoStar expects roughly 11.5 million square feet of Chicago-area office space to simply disappear through demolition by 2031.

Even those enormous valuation declines may understate what lenders ultimately recover.

Distressed office properties sold this year have fetched prices roughly 20% below their latest appraisals, according to Deutsche Bank research cited in the report. In other words, marking a building down dramatically on paper doesn’t necessarily mean you’ve marked it down enough.

There is, however, another side to the collapse. Once prices fall far enough, someone eventually decides the risk is worth taking. That process is now beginning. Investors are stepping into buildings at fractions of their former valuations, effectively resetting the cost basis of properties that made little economic sense at yesterday’s prices.

The same 601W connected to the troubled Aon Center recently bought Chicago’s 175 West Jackson Boulevard for only $41 million, nearly 90% below its pre-Covid sale price. Elsewhere in Chicago, investors acquired the debt behind another major tower for around $100 million, roughly 76% below the building’s previous purchase price.

That’s probably the most important part of what is happening now. An office recovery doesn’t necessarily require these buildings to regain anything close to their old valuations. It requires the old valuations to finally die.

For years, the industry could avoid discovering what many of these buildings were actually worth because lenders kept extending loans and owners kept waiting. As maturities arrive and extensions become harder to obtain, those theoretical losses increasingly have to become actual ones.

And only after that happens can buildings move into new hands at prices that make sense in the post-Covid world. As Polpo Capital’s Dan McNamara put it: “One of the scariest headlines is that office CMBS delinquencies are higher than after 2008.”

“And it’s going to go higher as we face more maturities.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/commercial-real-estate-crash-moving-paper-losses-realized-losses

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

More US Homebuyers Apply For Riskier Mortgages As Interest Rates Top 7%

 by Andrew Moran via The Epoch Times,

Higher interest rates pushed prospective homebuyers toward riskier mortgages last week, new industry data show.

The total volume of mortgage applications declined almost 2 percent for the week ending Sept. 18, according to a report released by the Mortgage Bankers Association on Sept. 23. This represented the third consecutive weekly drop.

Applications for a mortgage to purchase a home fell 1 percent and were down 11 percent from the same time a year ago. Refinancing applications also fell to their lowest levels since February 2025, down 3 percent monthly, and were 62 percent lower year over year.

"Applications for both refinance and purchase loans declined further last week, noting that the comparison is to the week that included the Labor Day holiday," Mike Fratantoni, the group's senior vice president and chief economist, said in a news release.

Last week's decline aligned with the sharp increase in interest rates.

Because fixed-rate mortgage costs have accelerated in recent weeks, borrowers sought riskier adjustable-rate mortgages - also known as ARMs - Fratantoni added.

"With fixed rates much higher, more borrowers opted for ARMs, with the ARM share reaching 9.8%, as rates for 5/1 ARMs were more than a percentage point lower than those for fixed rate loans," he said in a statement.

The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages rose to 7.12 percent, from 6.97 percent - the highest since May 2024.

Mortgage rates have increased by more than 100 basis points since the United States and Israel launched a joint military operation against Iran in late February. The conflict, approaching the seven-month mark, has sent Treasury bond yields surging.

The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield reached 5 percent again midweek, up from 3.96 percent before the war in Iran began. The mortgage market generally tracks government bond yields, resulting in higher borrowing costs for prospective buyers.

ARMs start with a lower fixed rate for three to ten years, then change every six months or annually based on market conditions. This product saves borrowers money upfront but can swing higher or lower based on benchmark rates.

Mortgage rates have ticked up slightly so far this week.

As of Sept. 22, the average 30-year fixed rate was 7.17 percent, according to Mortgage News Daily.

Fueling Interest Rates

Global energy markets and inflation data have been the driving forces behind interest rates and will determine the Federal Reserve's next policy decision, says Jeff DerGurahian, head economist at loanDepot.

"For now, rates appear to be standing at a fork in the road. Softer inflation and lower oil prices could provide relief, while continued energy pressure could keep mortgage rates near or above 7%," DerGurahian said in a note emailed to The Epoch Times.

Crude prices have fallen sharply this week, with U.S. oil down about 10 percent to around $91 per barrel. Brent, the international benchmark, returned above $100 midweek.

As of Sept. 22, the national average for a gallon of diesel has risen to $6.52, according to the American Automobile Association.

Meanwhile, the next major inflation report will be August's personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index, the Fed's go-to inflation measure.

After that, the September consumer price index report will be released in mid-October.

The Cleveland Fed projects annual headline consumer inflation will jump to 3.5 percent, but core inflation, which strips out volatile energy and food prices, will hold steady at 2.4 percent.

Until then, investors are leaning toward another quarter-point rate hike at the October Federal Open Market Committee policy meeting after the Fed followed through last week on the first increase to the benchmark federal funds rate since July 2023.

"Those expectations are not set in stone though," DerGurahian said.

"If oil prices move lower or the September core inflation reading comes in softer than expected, the October hike could be pushed further out. Continued improvement could even cause markets to remove one of the three future hikes currently priced in."

Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh will hold the next two-day meeting on Oct. 27 and 28.

https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/more-us-homebuyers-apply-riskier-mortgages-interest-rates-top-7

KB Home Call Highlights: Built-to-Order Shift Lifts Margins as Backlog Grows for First Time in 4 Years

 

  • Total Revenues: $1.3 billion in Q3 fiscal 2026.
  • Housing Revenues: $1.3 billion, at midpoint of guidance; down 20% from $1.6 billion year-over-year.
  • Net Income: $65 million, compared to $110 million a year earlier.
  • Diluted EPS: $1.05, versus $1.61 in the prior-year quarter.
  • Homes Delivered: 2,732 homes, a 19% year-over-year decrease.
  • Average Selling Price: $473,000, modestly higher than Q2; Q4 guidance implies ~$480,000.
  • Housing Gross Profit Margin: 16.5%, down from 18.2% year-over-year; up sequentially from Q2.
  • Adjusted Housing Gross Profit Margin: 16.8%, versus 18.9% a year ago; improved sequentially from 15.7% in Q2.
  • Home Building Operating Income: $67 million, or 5.2% of revenues, versus $131 million, or 8.1%, a year earlier.
  • SG&A Ratio: 11.3%, at low end of guidance; up from 10% year-over-year.
  • Pre-Tax Income: $81 million, compared to $143 million a year earlier.
  • Effective Tax Rate: 19.6%, versus 23.3% prior year; Q4 expected ~26%, full year ~23%.
  • Backlog Conversion Rate: 60%, compared to 71% a year ago.
  • Built-to-Order Mix: 74% of deliveries, up from 60% in Q2.
  • Unsold Inventory: 26% of production, down from 41% a year ago; finished unsold homes 9%, down from 16%.
  • Cash: $159 million at quarter end.
  • Total Liquidity: $942 million, including $783 million available under unsecured credit facility.
  • Debt-to-Capital Ratio: 35.7%, compared to 33% a year ago.
  • Inventory: $6 billion, up 5% year-over-year.
  • Lots Owned or Controlled: Over 61,000 lots.
  • Share Repurchases: ~890,000 shares (~1.5% of shares outstanding) at average price below book value; up to $50 million planned for Q4.
  • Capital Returned to Shareholders: Over $65 million in Q3, inclusive of dividends.
  • Book Value Per Share: Over $62.
  • Community Count: Q4 ending community count expected between 270 and 275, roughly in line with prior year.
  • Mortgage Capture Rate: 85%, up slightly from Q2.
  • Average Cash Down Payment: 16%, or about $76,000.
  • Average Buyer Household Income: ~$134,000; average FICO score 742.
  • All-Cash Buyers: ~8% of Q3 deliveries.
  • Build Times: 99 days start-to-completion, 19% faster year-over-year; target of 90 days.
  • Release Date: September 22, 2026

For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

Positive Points

  • KB Home KBH +0.44%
    83
    met or exceeded guidance across all metrics in Q3 2026, with housing revenues of $1.3 billion and diluted EPS of $1.05.
  • The company successfully returned to a predominantly built-to-order model, with BTO homes comprising 74% of deliveries, up from 60% in Q2, driving a sequential improvement in housing gross margin.
  • KB Home (KBH) achieved a year-over-year increase in backlog for the first time in four years, providing a foundation for future deliveries.
  • Unsold inventory remains low, with total unsold inventory at 26% of production (down from 41% a year ago) and finished unsold homes at just 9% (down from 16%).
  • Build times improved to an average of 99 days, down 19% year-over-year, enhancing inventory turns and operational efficiency.
  • The company maintains a strong balance sheet with $942 million in total liquidity and a debt-to-capital ratio of 35.7%, supporting growth and shareholder returns.
  • KB Home (KBH) returned over $65 million to shareholders in Q3 through share repurchases and dividends, and plans up to $50 million more in Q4 repurchases.
  • The company has a solid land pipeline with over 61,000 owned or controlled lots, positioning it for future growth when market conditions improve.

Negative Points

  • Market conditions weakened since the last earnings call, with rising mortgage rates, persistent inflation, and geopolitical uncertainty dampening consumer demand.
  • Net orders declined year-over-year as sales softened sequentially in July and August, with traffic down and buyers becoming more cautious.
  • Q4 guidance was moderated: average selling price is now expected at ~$480,000 (down from ~$500,000) and gross margin is expected to be about one percentage point lower than prior guidance.
  • Housing gross profit margin declined to 16.5% in Q3 from 18.2% a year ago, reflecting pricing pressures and higher costs.
  • Direct costs are expected to rise sequentially in Q4 due to fuel surcharges, general inflation, and tariffs, pressuring margins.
  • Resale inventory has increased to its highest level in a decade, with pricing starting to decline in more markets, adding competitive pressure.
  • SG&A expense ratio increased to 11.3% from 10% a year ago, due to lower operating leverage, though partially offset by cost reductions.
  • Debt-to-capital ratio rose to 35.7% from 33% a year ago, reflecting increased inventory investments and share repurchases.

Q & A Highlights

Q: With KB Home having achieved its goal of returning to a predominantly built-to-order business model, is the long-term gross margin target of 22% still in play?
A: Robert McGibney, President and COO, confirmed that 22% remains the target. He noted that current market conditions are not conducive to hitting that margin, but the company is sticking to its underwriting discipline, which has led them to walk away from land deals that no longer meet their return criteria.

Q: Given the current market conditions, is the fourth quarter gross margin representative of the mix (built-to-order, Northern/Southern California) we should expect for the first half of 2027?
A: Robert McGibney, President and COO, stated that Q4 guidance is based on current conditions. He expects the Southern California mix to rotate back in, as the current weakness was partly due to missed openings of high-ASP communities. While not giving 2027 guidance, he expressed pleasure with the shift back to built-to-order and aligning starts with sales.

Q: Can you bridge the gross margin from Q3 to Q4, detailing the puts and takes?
A: William Hollinger, CFO, explained that the sequential decline from 16.8% in Q3 to an anticipated 16.3% in Q4 is due to pricing pressures, higher costs, and product/geographic mix (specifically Southern California). These negative factors are expected to more than offset a positive contribution of about 50 basis points from operating leverage.

Q: With the shift to built-to-order and a backlog of pre-sold homes, are you forced to offer incentives at the closing table when rates rise, to keep buyers in the deal or help them qualify?
A: Robert McGibney, President and COO, said it does happen, but it's minimal. The primary strategy is to lock in buyers' interest rates early in the process, which is easier with the current ~90-day build time. While some minor adjustments are made in backlog, it is not a significant overall cost.

Q: Can you provide an update on the pipeline for the high-margin Bay Area communities and how long you expect an outsized contribution from them?
A: Robert McGibney, President and COO, said the company is rebuilding its Northern California business to its former strength. He expects a few more quarters of ramping up as new communities come online, after which the business will find a new equilibrium. He expects a mix benefit to continue into 2027.

Q: With mortgage rates moving higher, how should we think about your willingness to let the absorption pace drift lower to protect gross margin? Is there a floor?
A: Robert McGibney, President and COO, stated that targets are set community by community based on various factors. While the long-term goal is around four sales per month per community, the company is not looking to force that pace at the expense of margin in the current choppy market. The focus is on managing each asset for the best return profile.

Q: Can you discuss the increase in land spend this quarter and how we should think about it going forward?
A: Robert McGibney, President and COO, explained that the increase is mostly related to development and fees for land that was previously purchased, rather than new raw land acquisitions. This is part of the normal progression of their land pipeline.

Q: Can you provide more detail on the value engineering efforts and how they will impact future quarters?
A: Robert McGibney, President and COO, described value engineering as an ongoing process, not a one-time event. Current efforts focus on standardization, such as simplifying floor plans and building envelopes, to reduce costs without taking value away from the customer. This is a continuous focus for the architecture team.

Q: You mentioned seeing additional pricing pressure from the resale market. Are there specific markets where this is having a more outsized impact?
A: Robert McGibney, President and COO, said the impact is very submarket-specific. While markets like Texas and Florida have elevated resale inventory, the competitive pressure varies by community. He noted that sellers are starting to become more realistic with prices, which is a positive sign for the market to find balance.

Q: With leverage back at roughly 30%, how much longer can you continue to return more capital to shareholders than you are bringing in on a free cash basis?
A: Jeffrey Mezger, CEO, stated that capital allocation is a disciplined balance of land investment, growth appetite, and cash flow. He noted that land spend may come down a little in the current environment, which will influence the pace of share repurchases. The company will remain programmatic and opportunistic while maintaining a solid balance sheet.

For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

https://www.gurufocus.com/news/9092733/kb-home-kbh-q3-2026-earnings-call-highlights-builttoorder-shift-lifts-margins-as-backlog-grows-for-first-time-in-four-years

Saturday, September 19, 2026

Los Angeles Ranks Last Among 100 US Metros For Affordability And New Home Construction

 by Mary Prenon via The Epoch Times,

Des Moines, Iowa, ranked first and Los Angeles ranked last in Realtor.com's inaugural report grading the 100 largest U.S. metros on housing affordability and homebuilding activity.

The results highlighted how local zoning and permitting can affect housing affordability in different areas.

The real estate platform's first Metro Affordability and Homebuilding Report Card, released on Sept. 16, showed that Des Moines received an "A+" grade with a score of 83.4, the highest among the 100 metros analyzed, reflecting its strong residential construction activity and affordability.

The city has a median listing price of $349,903, with the monthly mortgage payment requiring 27.5 percent of a median-income household's income, below the commonly cited threshold of 30 percent.

The calculation assumed a 10 percent down payment and a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage with a 6.5 percent interest rate.

At the other end of the list, Los Angeles received an "F" grade with a score of 12, leaving it at the bottom of the 100-metro ranking.

The median listing price in the city stands at $1.129 million, requiring a household earning the median income to spend 84.4 percent of its income on the monthly mortgage payment on a typical home, according to the report.

Meanwhile, the report said that local housing policies can help explain the gap between the highest- and lowest-performing metro areas in new home construction and affordability.

"Beyond land availability, the biggest difference between the 'A' metros and the 'F' metros is local housing policy, especially related to zoning and permitting," Realtor.com senior economist Joel Berner said in the report.

"The 'A's share regulatory flexibility and streamlined approval processes, while the 'F's are locked in restrictive land-use frameworks."

The report noted that Des Moines had a permit-to-population ratio of 1.85, meaning the city was issuing permits for new homes at a rate 85 percent higher than the national average relative to its population.

By contrast, Los Angeles' ratio of 0.47 meant that the city was permitting less than half the national average relative to its population.

"The combination of extreme affordability pressure and limited new supply placed it at the bottom of the class," the report noted.

Along with Los Angeles, New York City, Providence, Rhode Island, Honolulu, and Boston also had failing grades.

For example, Berner said, Boston has four times as many pages of zoning law as Austin, Texas, and 79 percent of its land is zoned, compared with just 15 percent in Austin.

Minimum parking mandates apply to 88 percent of land in Boston, while in Austin, the requirement is 37 percent.

Boston also has less land that allows unrestricted accessory dwelling units, limiting the supply of smaller, more affordable homes.

"The contrast between Austin and Boston makes clear that the rules governing what can be built can be just as consequential as the land available to build on," Berner added.

Those top-ranked metros with less restrictive zoning and permitting also include: Raleigh, North Carolina; Columbia, South Carolina; Houston; and Indianapolis.

Regionally, the South and Midwest performed best for both new construction and affordability, while the Northeast and West lagged.

The report attributes the difference to more available and lower-cost land in the South and Midwest, in addition to more flexible zoning and permitting policies.

"Homebuilding and affordability are inseparable, and if we want to improve affordability in a lasting way, we need to build more homes," Realtor.com chief economist Danielle Hale said in the report. "The metros at the top of these rankings show that buyers benefit most when communities pair homes that are attainable for today's local earners with enough new construction to support tomorrow's demand."

In its Sept. 16 report, the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) and the Wells Fargo Housing Market Index found that builder confidence in September hit the lowest level since September 2025.

"Buyer traffic has weakened across much of the country, largely because of rising mortgage rates," NAHB Chairman Bill Owens said in the report.

The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate was 6.95 percent for the week ending Sept. 17, up from 6.76 percent the previous week and 6.26 percent a year earlier, according to Freddie Mac.

Owens also said builders continue to face higher material costs, rising energy prices, and ongoing labor shortages.

NAHB chief economist Robert Dietz added that 42 percent of builders rated current lot availability as "poor," and 38 percent as just "fair."

According to Realtor.com, the United States remains short of more than 4 million homes, putting financial strain on first-time homebuyers.

https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/los-angeles-ranks-last-among-100-us-metros-affordability-and-new-home-construction

Friday, September 18, 2026

Most Americans don’t know this $0-down mortgage exists — and 97% of the U.S. qualifies

 The home affordability crisis rages on.

According to the Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University, an unprecedented 43.5 million U.S. households were considered “cost-burdened” in 2024, which means they had to dedicate more than 30% of their monthly income to housing costs, an increase of 6.4 million households since 2019.

Those costs were driven primarily by higher mortgage interest and insurance rates. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the median housing costs for homeowners with a mortgage rose from $1,960  to $2,035 in 2024. But there is another barrier for people looking to buy a home — the down payment — and in 2026, that barrier is bigger than ever.

According to recent data from the National Association of Realtors, the median price for a single-family existing home in the U.S. is now $434,800. That means half of all existing homes sold in the U.S. in the second quarter of 2026 cost more than $434,900. In some areas, the median is much higher.

The markets with the biggest yearly price gains aren’t in expensive metros like New York City and San Francisco; they’re in places like Beaumont-Port Arthur, Texas ( up 11.0%), Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, Mississippi (up by 10.3%) and Syracuse, New York, which is up by 9.6%. Fortunately, there is a solution that many prospective homebuyers either don’t know about or don’t know they qualify for: the USDA zero down payment mortgage.

What is the USDA zero down payment mortgage?

The roots of the USDA loan go back to the Great Depression when Congress under Franklin D. Roosevelt was fighting the severe economic consequences battering farmers. The federal government realized that without intervention, the nation’s agricultural backbone would collapse, and rural populations would migrate to already overcrowded cities. The loan program was created to incentivize people to stay in rural areas by providing them with a path to livable housing.

In the decades since, the mandate of the USDA has expanded, as has the availability of the USDA guaranteed loan. The primary benefit of this program is the $0 down payment requirement, allowing buyers to finance the entire purchase price of the property. Credit score criteria are also generally more flexible than you find with conventional mortgages, making it easier for first-time buyers to qualify. 

What most people don’t know, according to Ashley Harris, Director of Homebuyer Education at Neighbors Bank, is that “97% of US land mass falls in an eligible area, and most regions cap household income around $122,800 (higher in some high-cost areas),” so eligibility criteria are more inclusive than many people imagine. You can look up the local income limit here.

The deciding factor isn’t whether the neighborhood looks rural, but rather the area’s population density. The USDA uses a strict, tiered population framework to determine if a town, census-designated place or suburban pocket qualifies.

The first tier is areas with a population under 10,000 residents. The second tier is between 10,001 and 20,000 residents, as long as these areas aren’t part of a larger Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and have a proven lack of affordable mortgage credit for low- to moderate-income families.

The final tier is the most surprising to most mortgage shoppers. If the area has between 20,001 and 35,000 residents, it can still qualify for USDA loans, but only if it was previously designated as rural in the past and lost that status due to growth but still lacks affordable housing options.

Rules of thumb for eligible suburbs

If you think buying in a more sparsely populated suburban area is more suitable for your budget, there are some rules of thumb to help you look in the right places.

Think outside the city limits

The sweet spot for suburban eligibility is usually a 15- to 20- mile radius outside the city limits of a metropolitan area. Commuter towns on the very edge of an MSA boundary are frequently eligible.

Think in census tracts rather than neighborhoods

Because USDA boundaries are drawn using census tracts rather than street grids, the eligibility line can literally cut right through the middle of a single suburban subdivision. A house on one side of the street might be eligible, while the house across the street is not.

Think mid-sized city, not megalopolis

A town of 15,000 people sitting 10 miles outside a massive city like Chicago or Dallas might be disqualified because it is swallowed by the urban MSA. However, that same town sitting 15 miles outside a mid-sized city (for example, one with 100,000 residents) will almost certainly qualify.

The ultimate rule of thumb is to never assume what the USDA eligibility status is based on how an area looks. You can look up any address for free a USDA Property Eligibility Map. If the address falls in a shaded ineligible zone, it cannot be financed with a USDA loan. There are no exceptions or workarounds.

What to know about USDA loans before you apply

USDA loans are an underutilized resource for housing affordability. But before you start shopping for a new home, there are some important things to keep in mind.

USDA loans come with maximum household income limits

In most standard-cost areas across the U.S., the 2026 income limit is capped at $122,800 for households up to four members and $162,100 for households with five to eight members. In areas where the cost of living is higher — for example, counties neighboring high-cost metro areas like Monterey in northern California and exurban areas of New York and New Jersey — the income caps may exceed $150,000 to $200,000 for larger families.

Buyers need to keep in mind the “everyone counts” rule, which calculates eligibility based on the total income of all adult residents. That means adult children with incomes and potential room mates also add to the maximum income calculation.

Properties come with conditions attached

Despite being issued by the Department of Agriculture, you can’t use a standard USDA loan to buy a working farm.

These loans are for primary residences only — no vacation homes, second homes, investment properties or properties for commercial income producing activities are allowed. According to a 2025 analysis by BatchData, “89.6% of single-family rentals are held by ‘mom-and-pop’ landlords,” some of whom are “accidental landlords” as they turned a starter home into a rental or jumped on the Airbnb bandwagon and started renting out a room in their residence.

While you can rent out a USDA-backed property after you have lived in the home as your primary residence for a significant period (typically at least 12 months), renting it out immediately or buying it with the intent to rent is considered mortgage fraud.

You also can’t buy a “fixer-upper” home with a standard USDA loan. Before you’re approved, an appraiser must certify that the property is safe and structurally sound. Issues like a failing roof, electrical or structural issues will require repairs before your loan is approved.

Zero-down mortgage doesn’t mean you won’t owe money at closing

Though the USDA provides an enormous financial benefit to borrowers by allowing them to finance the entire cost of their home, that doesn’t mean you won’t have to pay any money before you take possession of the house.

To keep the program funded, the USDA charges two mandatory “guarantee fees”: the first is an upfront 1% fee based on your total loan amount; the second is a 0.35% annual fee based on the principal balance. For example, a house that costs $350,000 will have a $3,500 up-front fee assessed and will be charged the $1,225 annual fee. This latter fee is divided by 12 and added to your mortgage statement. It also decreases every month as you pay down the principal.

The bottom line

For homebuyers without a large down payment saved up, the USDA loan is a great opportunity to buy a home and start building equity. If you meet the conditions and you find a property within the guidelines, a USDA loan can save you thousands of dollars.

While it does come with some restrictions, the payoff is the ability to bypass the years of saving typically required for a standard down payment. By allowing you to keep your cash for other expenses, this underutilized program provides a vital financial cushion. 

For those willing to cast their house-hunting net just a few miles further from the city center, a USDA loan isn’t just an alternative financing option, it’s a realistic bridge over the affordability gap and a direct path to building long-term wealth.

https://nypost.com/real-estate/what-is-usda-loan-eligibility-requirements/

NYC homelessness reaches 5-year high

 Homelessness on New York City’s streets reached an alarming five-year high amid socialist Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s still-fledgling term, data released Thursday shows.

Nearly 5,000 unsheltered people were estimated to be living on streets, parks, under highways, and in subways and public transit stations across the city during an annual survey conducted in March, according to the Mayor’s Management Report.

That is up 11% compared to fiscal year 2025 — and an astounding 45% surge from fiscal year 2022.

A homeless man panhandles on University Place at Union Square in New York, Thursday, February 19, 2026.Helayne Seidman for the NY Post
A homeless person sleeps under a blanket to keep warm on W35th Street in New York.Christopher Sadowski for NY Post
The worrisome findings from the Homeless Outreach Population Estimate are not only buried near the end of a section on homelessness, but seemingly waved off as a weather-related aberration.

“While the HOPE survey is typically conducted in late January, this year’s effort was postponed until March due to historic winter weather,” the report states.

A homeless person stands on a street in Manhattan.Getty Images

“Ultimately, the average temperature on the day the survey was conducted—March 10—was nearly 60 degrees, the highest ever on the day of the survey and about 20 degrees above recent years.”

The data shows street homelessness has increased during each survey since the 2022 fiscal year, when former mayor Eric Adams was in office.

https://nypost.com/2026/09/18/us-news/nyc-homelessness-reaches-alarming-5-year-high-in-damning-indictment-on-lefty-policies-report/