Search This Blog

Sunday, August 23, 2026

How Much Is Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Montecito Mansion Really Worth?

 Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's decision to move back to the U.K. with their children, Archie and Lilibet, has raised a host of questions about the couple's future—not least what they plan to do with the opulent Montecito mansion in California, where they have been residing for the past six years.

When the news of their relocation was first revealed via reports in People magazine and The Telegraph, sources insisted that the Sussexes currently have no plans to sell the property, which they purchased soon after stepping down from their roles as senior working royals.

The couple purchased the property for $14.65 million in June 2020 and Realtor.com® currently estimates that, on paper, the manse is worth around $16.73 million today. However, experts say that Harry, 41, and Meghan, 45, could end up earning much more for the dwelling if they decide to sell.

Holding onto the property would enable Harry and Meghan to travel between the U.K. and the U.S. seamlessly—and means that both will have a permanent residence in their own home country. However, there is a steep price to pay for such convenience.

First and foremost, the monthly costs of maintaining their Montecito abode are incredibly high; annual property taxes for the year 2025 were just over $152,000—or $12,667 a month—while the monthly payments on their $9.52 million adjustable-rate mortgage are estimated between $40,000 and $43,000.

Add to that the cost of maintenance, security, and monthly bills, and experts estimate that the couple could be paying as much as $650,000 a year, or $54,167 a month, just to keep their California dwelling.

By comparison, the couple was reportedly paying $24,500 a month in rent for their most recent U.K. dwelling, a royal residence on the grounds of Windsor Castle called Frogmore Cottage. The $3.3 million renovations to that home were also initially paid for by the British taxpayer, however the Sussexes were required to repay that money after stepping down as working royals.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Take Children Archie and Lilibet to Stay at Princess Diana's Chidlhood Home
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's decision to move back to the U.K. has raised questions about the couple's future—not least what they plan to do with the opulent Montecito mansion in California, where they have been residing for the past six years.Instagram/Meghan Markle
Prince Harry Reveals Glimpse at $14.65 Million Montecito Mansion In Surprise Video Appearance
The couple bought the property for $14.65 million in June 2020, not long after they relocated to California. Google Maps

Then there is the question of their new U.K. home, which the couple is understood to have already found—and which they will be funding privately, without any subsidies from the royal family.

Palace sources have made crystal clear that Harry and Meghan are returning to England as private citizens, not as official working members of the royal family, which means they will not have the benefit of using a royally-subsidized residence.

Whether they choose to buy a home or rent a house, the understanding is that they will be paying for it entirely out of pocket.

When all is said and done, it could be of huge financial benefit to the couple to sell their Montecito base, provided they are happy to commit to living in the U.K. permanently, or perhaps downsize to a smaller California dwelling that is cheaper to maintain.

Speculation is already rife that the duo are busy weighing their options as far as a sale is concerned, with the New York Post suggesting that there "have been rumblings" within the star-studded Santa Barbara enclave that Harry and Meghan are eyeing a sale.

One real estate agent noted that, should the Sussexes want to test the market, they will likely do so privately, rather than listing the property on the MLS, in a bid to avoid the publicity that would come with such a high-profile move.

How much could Harry and Meghan sell their Montecito home for?

While RealEstimate home valuations are calculated using "computer-driven mathematical models that use basic property characteristics, local market information, and price trends," one of the key elements no valuation model can take into account is the celebrity cachet attached to this kind of home.

Forensic real estate appraiser Orell Anderson, president of Strategic Property Analytics, Inc, notes that, in Harry's case, his high-profile reputation will be even more significant as far as the estimated value of his home is concerned.

"This is not a celebrity. Celebrities are interesting and fun, and we love to hear about them, but this is a superstar," Anderson said, referring to Prince Harry's status as fifth in line to the throne. "These are the people at the top end. They're more than celebrities. I suspect that there might be a premium for that.

"For the right buyer, Harry and Meghan having lived there may create a kind of connoisseur value because that history cannot be reproduced."

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle celebrate their anniversary at Montecito home
Forensic real estate appraiser Orell Anderson, President of Strategic Property Analytics, Inc, notes that Harry's royal status could well increase the value of his home as far as some buyers are concerned. Instagram/Meghan Markle
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle reveal their Christmas card
It's also thought that the couple may have made several updates to the property in the years since they bought it, which would not be reflected in online estimates of its value. Instagram/Meghan Markle

In fact, such is the prominence of Harry's international profile that Anderson said he could see how some might suggest the home is worth somewhere "in the $50 million to $60 million range," simply by glancing at its location and ownership history.

"The real question is whether the market evidence verifies that this particular property belongs there," he added.

Other key elements to factor into the home's valuation are the private renovations, additions, or upgrades that might have been made to the property in the time since it was last sold. Any changes that have been made and not publicly declared would not be included in a valuation model estimate.

While Harry and Meghan have kept many elements of their home out of the public eye, sharing just a few glimpses inside their kitchen, entryway, and office spaces in a few social media posts, it's thought that they have carried out some work to the property over the last six years, which could potentially increase its value.

For example, when the Sussexes' mansion was last put on the market, it was listed as having seven bedrooms and 13.5 bathrooms. However, recent reports suggest that it now has nine bedrooms and 16 bathrooms. Similarly, the square footage was last listed at just over 14,500, while more recent reporting puts that figure at closer to 18,000 square feet.

Interestingly, however, Anderson said that prospective buyers looking for a luxury home—at least those who aren't impressed by the public profile of its owners—will likely be more focused on the value of the land beneath the property, rather than the structure itself.

"At this end of the market, I’d start with the land, not the house," he said. "Buyers at this level have options, and they can be remarkably unforgiving about privacy, views, usable acreage, access, and anything else that changes how a property feels relative to its competitors.

"[Any] improvements [that have been made] may be extraordinary and still contribute far less than they cost to build. The house can be changed. The land cannot."

Meghan Markle Shows Off Incredible Gardens at $14.65 Million Mansion as She Completes Seasonal 'Harvest'
For example, when the Sussexes' mansion was last put on the market, it was listed as having seven bedrooms and 13.5 bathrooms. However, recent reports suggest that it now has nine bedrooms and 16 bathrooms. Instagram/Meghan
Meghan Markle Shows Off Incredible Gardens at $14.65 Million Mansion as She Completes Seasonal 'Harvest'
A property that sits on very similar acreage in the same neighborhood as the couple's mansion is currently on the market for $29.5 million. Instagram/Meghan
What are the Sussexes' neighbors selling their homes for?

Then, of course, there are the market comparisons, which help to give clarity when listing prices are being set.

Any agent that might one day take on Harry and Meghan's property would undoubtedly turn their eyes to a nearby mansion, which sits on a parcel that is nearly identical to the Sussexes' home—and is currently on the market for $29.5 million.

That dwelling, which was originally listed in February 2025 for the even higher price of $36.5 million, has just five bedrooms and 6.5 bathrooms, and was first built in 1999, although it has been extensively updated in the years since.

Meanwhile, a property that sits on just 2.5 acres and offers just over 5,300 square feet of living space in the same neighborhood as the Sussexes' is currently on the market for $15.99 million.

Even if you look slightly farther afield—specifically to a Montecito home that was bought by A-list home flipper Ellen DeGeneres in November 2025—it's clear that price estimates don't always reflect a home's true value.

DeGeneres splashed out $27.44 million for that abode, which sits on just 3 acres and was sold to her in an off-market deal, despite its estimated value at the time being closer to $20 million.

Realtor.com data also indicates that Harry and Meghan could at least list their home for well above the $16.73 million valuation.

Senior economist Anthony Smith notes that the median listing price for Santa Barbara, CA—which is consistently ranked as one of the most expensive ZIPs in the U.S.—increased a whopping 49.8% between June 2020, when the Sussexes bought their home, and June 2026, rising from $4.3 million to $6.44 million.

For those luxury homes priced in the top 10%, that median list price increased even more during that same period, going from $11.6 million to $19.4 million, a surge of 71.9%.

Smith notes that putting a $16.73 million price tag on Harry and Meghan's home lags well behind the local market's overall growth—although he points out this can be the case with "extremely volatile ultraluxury" properties.

"The median days on market reflected this tightening market: Homes spent 90 days on market in June 2020, declining to 60 days by July 2026, significantly outpacing the national median appreciation of 26.4% over the same period," he adds.

https://www.realtor.com/news/celebrity-real-estate/prince-harry-meghan-markle-montecito-mansion-value-price/

Friday, August 21, 2026

Share of Equity-Rich Homes Near Five-Year Low

 The national share of equity-rich homes fell to 41.1 percent in the second quarter; Rate of seriously underwater homes held steady at 3.2 percent

 ATTOM, the leading provider of property data, AI-powered intelligence, and real estate analytics solutions, today released its second quarter 2026 U.S. Home Equity & Underwater Report, which shows that 41.1 percent of mortgaged residential properties in the country were equity-rich, meaning the combined estimated amount of loan balances secured by those properties was no more than half of their estimated market value.

That was down from 43.3 percent in the first quarter of the year and from 47.4 percent in the second quarter of 2025. After four straight quarters of decline, the national share of equity-rich homes is at its lowest point in nearly five years.

Meanwhile, 3.2 percent of properties in the second quarter of 2026 were considered seriously underwater, meaning the combined estimated balances of loans secured by the properties were at least 25 percent more than the properties’ estimated market value. That was the same rate as the previous quarter, but up from 2.7 percent at the same time last year.

“These two measures of home equity strength, the rates of equity-rich and seriously underwater homes, remain healthier than they were prior to 2020,” said Rob Barber, CEO of ATTOM. “However, both have been moving in less favorable directions over the past year, suggesting a trend worth watching.”

Four states saw rates of equity-rich homes rise

The share of equity-rich homes rose in 13 states quarter-over-quarter but just four states year-over year.

The states that experienced year-over-year increases in their shares of equity-rich homes were North Dakota (up from 30.2 percent to 32.9 percent equity-rich); South Dakota (up from 52.1 percent to 53.6 percent); Kentucky (up from 35.1 percent to 36.5 percent); and Wyoming (up from 45.3 percent to 46.6 percent).

The states with the largest annual drops in their shares of equity-rich homes were Minnesota (down from 37.6 percent to 20.1 percent equity-rich); Michigan (down from 50.8 percent to 39.3 percent); California (down from 56.9 percent to 45.6 percent); Washington (down from 52.4 percent to 43.2 percent); and Missouri (down from 46.1 percent to 37.8 percent).

In the second quarter of 2026, the states with the highest proportions of equity-rich homes were Vermont (78.9 percent); Montana (59 percent); Rhode Island (54.9 percent); South Dakota (53.6 percent); and New Hampshire (53.1 percent).

Seriously underwater rate shoots up in Minnesota

The proportion of seriously underwater homes rose in 18 states quarter-over-quarter and in 33 states and the District of Columbia year-over-year.

The states with the largest annual increases in their rates of seriously underwater homes were Minnesota (up from 2.6 percent to 12.1 percent of homes seriously underwater); South Dakota (up from 3.1 percent to 5.7 percent); Iowa (up from 5.9 percent to 7.8 percent); Michigan (up from 2.5 percent to 4 percent); and the District of Columbia (up from 3.7 percent to 5 percent).

The states with the biggest year-over-year drops in their rates of seriously underwater homes were Louisiana (down from 11.9 percent to 10.3 percent); Kentucky (down from 7 percent to 5.7 percent); North Dakota (down from 5 percent to 4 percent); Oklahoma (down from 5.6 percent to 4.7 percent); and New York (down from 2 percent to 1.5 percent).

In the second quarter of 2026, the states with the highest rates of seriously underwater homes were Minnesota (12.1 percent); Louisiana (10.3 percent); Iowa (7.8 percent); Mississippi (6.4 percent); and Arkansas (6 percent).

Nearly all big metros lost share of equity-rich homes year-over-year

The share of equity-rich homes was down quarter-over-quarter in 67.6 percent (73) of the 108 metropolitan statistical areas in ATTOM’s analysis, which included metros if they had populations of at least 500,000 and sufficient data to analyze. Year-over-year, the share of equity-rich homes was down in 96.3 percent (104) of those metro areas.

The metro areas with the highest rates of equity-rich homes in the second quarter of 2026 were San Jose, CA (59.1 percent); Portland, ME (56.4 percent); New York, NY (54.7 percent); Buffalo, NU (54.4 percent); and Providence, RI (53.1 percent).

The metros with the lowest rates of equity-rich homes for the quarter were Baton Rouge, LA (15.4 percent); Minneapolis, MN (16.9 percent); Fresno, CA (18.1 percent); New Orleans, LA (19.9 percent); and Richmond, VA (22.1 percent).

On the other end of the spectrum, the metros with the highest rates of seriously underwater homes were Minneapolis, MN (13.4 percent); Fresno, CA (10.9 percent); Baton Rouge, LA (10.9 percent); New Orleans, LA (8.5 percent); and Richmond, VA (6.7 percent).

Wide disparities in equity-rich rates between counties

Among counties with sufficient data to analyze, those with the highest shares of equity-rich homes in the second quarter of 2026 were Park County, MT (94.7 percent); Codington County, SD (92.2 percent); Lawrence County, SD (89 percent); Marquette County, MI (86.4 percent); and Chittenden County, VT (86.3 percent).

The counties with the smallest shares of equity-rich homes were Saint Bernard Parish, LA (10.8 percent); Sherburne County, MN (12.6 percent); Iberville Parish, LA (12.7 percent); Bossier Parish, LA (12.8 percent); and Long County, GA (13.3 percent).

Shrinking share of zip codes have at least 50 percent equity-rich homes

In the second quarter of 2026, at least half of all mortgaged homes were equity-rich in 21 percent (1,861) of the 8,865 zip codes with sufficient data to analyze.

The zip codes with the highest rates of equity-rich properties were 59047 in Livingston, MT (94.8 percent); 57201 in Watertown, SD (92.3 percent); 57783 in Spearfish, SD (90.4 percent); 57702 in Rapid City, SD (88.8 percent); and 49855 in Marquette, MI (87.9 percent).

Conclusion

The Q2 2026 U.S. Home Equity and Underwater Report found that the nation’s share of equity-rich homes continued to shrink to 41.1 percent, near a five-year low. The nationwide rate of seriously underwater homes stayed level quarter-over-quarter, but has risen consistently over the last year.

Report methodology

The ATTOM U.S. Home Equity & Underwater report provides counts of properties based on several categories of equity — or loan to value (LTV) — at the state, metro, county and zip code level, along with the percentage of total properties with a mortgage that each equity category represents. The equity/LTV is calculated based on record-level loan model estimating position and amount of loans secured by a property and a record-level automated valuation model (AVM) derived from publicly recorded mortgage and deed of trust data collected and licensed by ATTOM nationwide for more than 160+ million U.S. properties. The ATTOM Home Equity and Underwater report has been updated and modified to better reflect a housing market focused on the traditional home buying process. ATTOM found that in markets where investors were more prominent, they would offset the loan to value ratio due to sales involving multiple properties with a single jumbo loan encompassing all of the properties. Therefore, going forward such activity is now excluded from the reports in order to provide traditional consumer home purchase and loan activity.

Definitions

Seriously underwater: Loan to value ratio of 125 percent or above, meaning the property owner owed at least 25 percent more than the estimated market value of the property.

Equity-rich: Loan to value ratio of 50 percent or lower, meaning the property owner had at least 50 percent equity.

https://www.attomdata.com/news/market-trends/home-sales-prices/q2-2026-home-equity-and-underwater-report/