Search This Blog

Sunday, June 7, 2026

Mobile home residents aim to buy whole park for $42.5M to avoid rent hikes, redevelopment

 Damien Teague has lived in San Lazaro Mobile Home Park in Boulder County, CO, for 18 years.

So when he received a Post-it on his door on March 20 saying that the owners were planning to sell the park for $42.5 million, his heart sank.

“The next morning, I was sitting on my back porch working with ChatGPT to explore my options, just feeling the stress of the unknowns,” he tells Realtor.com®.

“As I was sitting there, I also felt the stress of the 212 other households that were feeling the same thing, and that was enough for me to take action.”

The medically retired Navy veteran had learned of a Colorado law granting mobile home park residents the opportunity to buy their park if the owner plans to sell it or repurpose the property, giving residents the first right of refusal.

The owners of San Lazaro Mobile Home Park in Boulder County, Colorado, are planning to sell the property for $42.5 million — and residents hope to buy the whole park.Google Maps
Damien Teague had learned of a Colorado law granting mobile home park residents the opportunity to buy their park if the owner plans to sell it or repurpose the property, giving residents the first right of refusal.Google Maps

Twenty-two other states have similar laws on the books, according to manufactured housing industry expert Glenn D. Esterson.

In Colorado, residents have 120 days after receiving notice of the intent to sell to submit an offer. If no agreement is reached by the end of the 120-day period, the seller can proceed to sell the mobile home park to other buyers.

This gives San Lazaro residents until July 18 to obtain financing for the park’s full asking price, or face the risk of a new owner either jacking up monthly leases on lots or redeveloping the land.

Neighbors joining forces

While the task was daunting, Teague immediately began to organize.

“I posted notices that we would have a meeting about what options we have and what’s in front of us,” he says.

“Now, we have a nine-person steering committee, and the state and county have been really good working with us. A lot of people want to see us succeed.”

Sarah Huntley, the director of communication and engagement for the city of Boulder, tells Realtor.com, “City staff members have been in discussion with the residents of San Lazaro, and we’ve indicated support for their efforts. The city and the county of Boulder have agreed to get an appraisal of the property together.”

“I posted notices that we would have a meeting about what options we have and what’s in front of us,” Teague says.Google Maps

To raise funds, San Lazaro residents are reaching out to the Colorado State Housing Board, the Colorado Department of Local Affairs Mobile Home Park Acquisition Fund, local employers, investors, and organizations including Thistle Community Housing—a nonprofit that helps mobile home communities become resident-owned communities.

Lisa Krebs, Boulder County senior communications specialist, tells Realtor.com, “The county is aware that residents have begun the initial steps necessary to pursue becoming a resident-owned community.

“Boulder County has been talking with residents and organizations supporting them, including Thistle Community Housing. Boulder County is actively exploring ways to support residents through this process.”

Teague says the tight-knit community of 800-plus residents is worth fighting for. “We help each other out and have each other’s backs,” he says.

“We have a food share and a services share—and if someone is in need, we step up.”

He says there are many long-term tenants—including a 93-year-old woman who has lived in the park since it was established in 1966.

Crunching the numbers

Teague owns his mobile home, and rents the lot underneath it for about $1,000 a month. That’s 40% less than the median asking rent in the US, which is $1,673 per month according to Realtor.com data.

Teague says San Lazaro residents are fearful of what would happen if a corporate entity purchased the property and either hiked up rents or shut the park down.

It can cost a whopping $10,000 to $20,000 to move a manufactured home in most locations, according to Esterson.

Teague says San Lazaro residents are fearful of what would happen if a corporate entity purchased the property and either hiked up rents or shut the park down.Google Maps

“It’s scary to be in this unknown place,” says Teague.

But Teague and other residents are inspired by the nearby Sans Souci manufactured home community, which was purchased by residents in 2021 for $3.3 million.

“Since then, their lot rents have stabilized, the values of their homes have appreciated, and they have a voice of ownership in their homes,” says Teague. “It’s very inspiring to see other people who have been down this road and have been successful.”

San Lazaro Park Properties LLP, which is based in Minnesota, has owned San Lazaro Mobile Home Park since 1983.

Attorney Brian Ray, who represents San Lazaro Park Properties, tells Realtor.com, “The park owner would like to communicate they are eager and excited to explore the possibility of the residents purchasing the park and will work with them in good faith towards their effort.”

San Lazaro residents are proposing a financing model similar to the one used last year to acquire two mobile home parks in Colorado’s Roaring Fork Valley for $42 million.

According to the Denver Post, that purchase was financed by a $26 million loan, with the remaining funds coming from a coalition of seven local governments that offered forgivable loans or grants, along with contributions from private donors.

Resident ownership on the rise

Esterson, the industry expert, tells Realtor.com that resident ownership of manufactured home communities has grown substantially over the last decade, and the pace is accelerating.

“A large driver is Resident Owned Communities USA, a national nonprofit that provides technical assistance and financing to resident groups looking to buy their communities,” he says.

“In states with strong purchase opportunity laws like New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Vermont, and Rhode Island, over 20% to 30% of parks are already resident-owned. We are seeing legislative momentum and more organized efforts nationally.”

Esterson says owning the park provides residents with stability.

Glenn D. Esterson tells Realtor.com that resident ownership of manufactured home communities has grown substantially over the last decade, and the pace is accelerating.Google Maps

“When residents own the land under their homes, the threat of closure, redevelopment, or abrupt rent escalation is reduced,” he says.

“Manufactured homes placed on leased land tend to appreciate in value because the tenure is secure. Residents also gain governance control, they elect the board, set policy, and direct capital improvements.”

However, Esterson says there are trade-offs.

“Resident ownership doesn’t eliminate the financial pressures of operating a park, it transfers them,” he explains.

“Many communities are carrying years of deferred maintenance, aging infrastructure, and rising tax and insurance burdens at the time of purchase.

“It’s a significant undertaking, and the success of a resident-owned community depends heavily on the quality of its management, its access to capital, and realistic expectations about operating costs from day one.”

Teague says they’re preparing for those expenses, and will do what it takes to keep their village intact.

“We’re a true community, which in this day and age is becoming much more rare,” he says. “We don’t want to lose that.”

https://nypost.com/2026/06/06/real-estate/colorado-mobile-home-residents-aim-to-buy-whole-park-for-42-5m-to-avoid-rent-hikes-redevelopment/

Saturday, June 6, 2026

https://nypost.com/2026/06/06/us-news/short-term-rental-prices-in-nj-and-nyc-skyrocket-over-1500-per-night-during-world-cup-matches/

Pratt, Mamdani should both follow this NY city’s housing lead

 Insurgent Los Angeles mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt and New York City socialist Mayor Zohran Mamdani don’t agree on much.

Pratt pledges to force homeless drug addicts into treatment; Mamdani aims to swell the “homeless services” budget to $4.2 billion.

Pratt proposes a major increase in the LAPD’s ranks; Mamdani halted plans to hire thousands of new NYPD officers.

An aerial view of New Rochelle as seen over New Rochelle, NY at dusk on August 31, 2022.
New Rochelle in Westchester County has figured out how to jump-start housing construction — and even managed to lower rents in the process. Christopher Sadowski

But the Republican Angeleno and the Gracie Mansion DSA member do agree on one thing: Their cities take far too long to issue developers the legally required permits they need to start building new homes — and both have promised to speed up the process.

Pratt vows “faster approvals, lower costs, measurable results” and says he’ll drop permit fees completely for single-family-home rebuilding if elected — a response to the glacial permitting that’s thwarted the restoration of LA’s fire-ravaged neighborhoods.

Mamdani intends to make permitting “faster and fairer.”

Both might be surprised to learn that a much smaller city in Westchester County has already figured out how to jump-start housing construction — and has managed to lower rents in the process. 

Since 2015 the City of New Rochelle, pop. 85,000, has found a way to enable construction of 5,130 new apartments and approve 2,746 more, with another 3,100 likely on the way.

All told, it will mean a 37% increase in its overall housing stock — a boon for the county and the entire region.  

Mayor Yadira Ramos-Herbert says her town has no need for rent controls; the flood of new construction has held rent increases to just 1.6% above 2020 levels.

Indeed, between 2020 and 2023, the average New Rochelle rent went down by 2% — even better than Mamdani’s rent-freeze campaign promise.  

Development Director Adam Salgado calls the “New Rochelle Model” a “supply-side solution” to the housing crisis.

The key change is both simple and an ambitious challenge for any bureaucracy: Three linchpin city agencies — the Bureau of Buildings, the Department of Development and the Planning Board — must give developers a thumbs-up or a thumbs-down within 90 days.

New Rochelle changed its zoning and conducted a general environmental review covering much of its downtown, allowing developers to avoid time sinks that once meant projects needed two years or more to gain approval.

To date, Salgado told me, not one project review has gone past 90 days. Most take just 60.

It may seem like plain common sense, but New Rochelle’s approach is actually radical enough that the city last month won the University of Utah’s annual Ivory Prize for housing affordability.

The city “set the playbook, then private developers could come and play,” Scott Rechler, chief executive of the development firm RXR, has said of the plan.

His firm has invested more than $1 billion in New Rochelle. Overall planned private investment: $2.5 billion.

Can New Rochelle provide a model for LA and Gotham? 

Both have a long way to go.

In New York, a new city report focused on speeding up the permitting process revealed that “before a project can begin construction, it must receive approvals from up to 15 City agencies.”  

No wonder the permitting process alone “takes 16 months on average.”

Add on the time of construction itself, and “it takes an average of over four years from the initial filing of a new building permit to officially complete construction and all inspections.”

In Los Angeles,  the Journal of Urban Economics recently found, it takes an average of four years to build a new multi-family building — with a year and a half of that devoted just to obtaining permits.

Researchers concluded that bringing that process down to one year — far longer than New Rochelle’s 90 days — could increase available housing in LA by 23.7%. 

The authors’ conclusion applies just as much to NYC as to LA: “Lengthy bureaucratic timelines” lead to “costly delay and disincentivizing of new investment.”

If Mamdani is willing to learn from Democratic New Rochelle, he should note that its fast-track approval rule applies to all proposed new housing, not just to so-called affordable (that is, income-restricted) units.

New Rochelle recognizes that more supply brings competition, and competition helps restrain housing prices overall.

It’s a lesson Mamdani should take to heart: His recently announced Streamlining Procedures to Expedite Equitable Development ( or SPEED) plan focuses only on reducing permit hold-ups for “affordable homes . . . frequently delayed by red tape.” 

In other words, it’s OK for market-rate housing to get stuck in the permitting mud.

That limited mindset will only serve to keep New York City mired in its never-ending housing crisis.

He’d do better to heed his New Rochelle counterpart, Mayor Ramos-Herbert.

“You can say rent control or rent freeze and I understand it,” she’s said. “But the success of our model has allowed us to invest and explore other opportunities around affordability.”

Howard Husock is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and author of “The Projects: A New History of Public Housing.”

https://nypost.com/2026/06/05/opinion/spencer-pratt-and-zohran-mamdani-should-follow-this-citys-housing-lead/