Search This Blog

Friday, August 7, 2026

NYC homeowners sue Mamdani over bungled pied-à-terre tax rollout

 A trio of Big Apple homeowners has filed suit to delay the state’s controversial new tax on luxury second homes — claiming Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s administration bungled the rollout.

The disgruntled owners charge that City Hall is unfairly burdening them by forcing them to prove they are full-time New Yorkers if they do not want to pay the pied-à-terre tax, according to the suit filed Friday in Staten Island Supreme Court.

The city Department of Finance “has arbitrarily and capriciously foisted onto New York City residents the burden of proving they are not subject to the Surcharge,” the filing states.

It also calls out the DOF’s move to publish a tax roll of nearly 1 million properties that may be subject to the new surcharge and the 17,000 notices it mailed to homeowners warning them they would be hit with five-figure bills unless they file for an exemption.

The city ignored its statutory obligation to do its homework first “to diligently assess and determine, using the vast resources at its disposal, the properties that are actually subject to the Surcharge,” the suit claims.

While the lawsuit does not challenge the law itself, it demands that a judge order the immediate scrubbing the 900,000-name list from the DOF website, claiming its publication “set off a panic among New York City homeowners.” 

The city has already “furiously backpedaled” to later state that the list was “meaningless,” according to the suit.

The list “should never have been posted in the first place” and “has caused mass confusion as a result, and should therefore be immediately removed from DOF’s website,” the lawsuit says.

The suit also requests an emergency injunction to void the 17,000 mailed notices and relieve homeowners from having to respond. The Mamdani administration last weekend extended the deadline to file for an exemption to Sept. 18, from the end of August.

The plaintiffs are represented by lawyer Randy Mastro, who served as first deputy mayor under Mamdani’s predecessor, Eric Adams.

Two of the suing homeowners are the wife and father of City Councilman Frank Morano, Rachel O’Brien and Carmine Morano both Staten Island residents; the third is a Chelsea resident, Simon Hedley. All claim they either received a notice letter that referred to their longtime primary residence, or that it was listed on the published tax roll.

“City Hall did this backwards,” the Republican pol told The Post. “This lawsuit is about forcing the administration to follow the law, clean up a botched rollout and stop making New Yorkers prove facts the government may already have at its fingertips.”

Two of the suing homeowners are the wife and father of City Councilman Frank Morano.Frank Morano/Instagram

The law, approved by the state Legislature and Gov. Kathy Hochul, is meant to apply to one- to three -family homes worth at least $5 million and co-ops and condominiums valued at $1 million or more that are unoccupied, non-primary residences.

Ahead of the notices being sent out, Mamdani last month released a taunting video telling owners of second homes worth more than $5 million to “check your mailbox.” 

But the warning letters sent out by DOF roughly tripled the number of homes that would be subject to the law, said the department’s former commissioner, Martha Stark.

Morano is a City Councilman from Staten Island.Frank Morano/Instagram

According to the city’s own published data, fewer than 3% of the 960,000 properties on the tax roll — roughly 24,000 — “meet the statutory value threshold” of $5 million for one- to three-family homes and $1 million for co-ops and condos, Stark said in an expert affirmation filed alongside the suit.

Stark, who has also been involved in a decade-long lawsuit over the city’s property tax system, claimed that the 17,000 letters were “strikingly over inclusive” and estimated that the true number of subject properties was between 5,000 and 6,000.

State law permitted the city to gain access to a far larger set of records — such as state income-tax data — to aid in assessing the properties subject to the new levy, “yet it published a list untethered to that information,” Stark claimed about the DOF.

The law is meant to apply to one-to-3 family homes worth at least $5 million and co-ops and condominiums valued at $1 million or more — that are unoccupied, non-primary residences.Bloomberg via Getty Images

Mastro himself said he received one of the notorious notices at his Upper East Side home, a massive six-bedroom townhouse he purchased for $14.3 million in 2016 and has lived in since.

“Given my recent employment by the city — in a high level role requiring that I reside in New York City no less, it is inconceivable that the City’s Department of Finance did not have records available to it demonstrating that my primary residence is at the property to which it sent me this notice,” Mastro wrote in a court filing.

Morano was elected to City Council in 2025.Courtesy Anthony DePrimo and Michael McWeeney

The suit names the city, Mamdani in his official role as mayor, the DOF and its commissioner, Richard Lee, as the plaintiffs.

Mamdani spokesman Matt Rauschenbach said the Department of Finance “has been working around the clock” to provide information to people who may be subject to the new tax.

“As the mayor has said, we also know that whenever government asks something new of New Yorkers, we have a responsibility to make the process clear, transparent and accessible.”

Rauschenbach said the city Law Department will fight the suit in court.

Mastro has emerged as a legal foil to many of Mamdani’s initiatives, already facing off in court over a controversial relocation of the Bellevue’s men’s shelter to the East Village and the city’s rent-freeze on stabilized units.

https://nypost.com/2026/08/07/us-news/nyc-homeowners-sue-over-mamdani-admins-alleged-bungled-pied-a-terre-tax-rollout/

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

'Griffin to stick with Park Ave. skyscraper plans despite Mamdani personal attack, anti-biz policies'

 Take that, Zohran Mamdani!

The mayor’s blind-side attack on Ken Griffin failed to derail plans for a $4.5 billion skyscraper home for Griffin’s Citadel companies.

The new tower at 350 Park Ave. will go up as planned, according to Steven Roth, the CEO of Griffin’s major partner Vornado Realty Trust.

Despite billionaire Ken Griffin’s feud with New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a new tower at 350 Park Ave. will go up as planned.Bloomberg via Getty Images

He said in the publicly-traded real estate company’s second-quarter earnings call Tuesday that he expects the joint-venture development agreement among Vornado, Griffin and minority partner Rudin to close in September. Roth indicated Vornado would exercise its full option to buy 36% of the JV.

Roth said, “We have a $3.3 billion construction loan ready to go” for the 1.8 million-square-foot, 1,600-foot-tall cloudbuster designed by Foster + Partners. 

Griffin’s Citadel and Citadel Securities would be anchor tenants with about 850,000 square feet.

Demolition of the old 350 Park Ave. and 40 E. 52nd St. is underway to make way for the new tower, as Roth noted.

Questions were raised about the project’s future after Mamdani made a video in April disparaging Griffin for owning a $200 million condo apartment.

Griffin said his participation in 350 Park Ave. was “under review” following the  hit.

He also said he would “double down” on Miami and add to Citadel’s considerable space there, hinting his commitment to Manhattan was uncertain.

The $4.5 billion skyscraper is being developed by Vornado, Griffin and minority partner Rudin.Foster + Partners
But all hands seem to be on board for the Park Avenue cloudbuster, which would create what Roth called a new “umbrella” for Midtown rents of $350 per square foot.

By comparison, the best buildings command in the $200s for large floors, although a few $300-plus deals have been struck for very small spaces.

Roth also said the partnership — “and by that, I mean all the partners” —  were “contemplating” a possible sale of a 25% interest “at a price which will give us an appropriate profit.” 

Such ownership dilutions to cash in on rising values are not uncommon in high-stakes new developments.

“We have a $3.3 billion construction loan ready to go” for the 1.8 million-square-foot, 1,600-foot-tall cloudbuster, said Vornado CEO Steve Roth.Getty Images

On a different topic, Roth denied Vornado had any intention to sell the former Pennsylvania Hotel site — “the best development site” in Manhattan – emphasizing it is “not for sale.”

The earnings call came as Manhattan hit new occupancy and rent peaks in the first half of 2026, which was on track for the strongest leasing year since before the pandemic.

https://nypost.com/2026/08/04/business/ken-griffin-to-stick-with-park-ave-skyscraper-plans-despite-mamdanis-personal-attack-anti-business-policies/

Monday, August 3, 2026

Can Homeowners Save New York State from Socialism?

 In November, the suburbs of New York City will be the pivotal arena for whether the Democratic Socialists of America cement their takeover of the entire state from their New York City stronghold. The decisive issue is not crime, deteriorating quality of life, or high taxes, but one that is arousing significant suburban anxiety: the DSA’s vendetta against the American Dream of homeownership.

Residents of Westchester and Nassau counties, which abut the northern Bronx and eastern Queens, and of whom 80% own their homes, are watching with increasing unease Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s mounting attacks on the city’s homeowners, and logically assuming that they are next.

Despite Westchester County’s nearly 3-1 Democrat voter registration advantage over Republicans and a 15% advantage in Nassau, the DSA’s Marxist belief that property ownership is evil may elect a Republican governor for the first time in more than 20 years. The electoral math is such that if Republican challenger Bruce Blakeman can earn a five-point swing in the metro area over Republican Lee Zeldin’s statewide 6% loss to Democrat Kathy Hochul in 2022, he clinches a Republican victory. Some political analysts believe that Zeldin lost because he failed to focus more on the threats to single-family housing.

Blakeman is the popular County Executive of Nassau, winning re-election in 2025 by 55%-45%; in contrast, Kathy Hochul’s favorability rating, according to the most recent Sienna poll, is 43%-44%, which is not good for an incumbent. Her support for the New York City mayor has contributed to her unpopularity.

The Mamdani administration is an avowed opponent of private property, excepting the Mamdani family’s residential assets here and in Uganda. Hochul and the Democrat-controlled legislature cravenly caved to his demand for a punitive surcharge on luxury second homes worth over $5 million under a new pied-a-terre tax. Not a peep was heard when the fine print revealed that the surcharge included every property worth $1 million or more, meaning more than 50% of the city’s homes. Crickets when he curated an easily searchable and doxable-friendly database of 960,000 of the city’s enemies of the people, previously known as property owners. Hochul informed the press that it was nothing “out of the ordinary.”

Democrats were silent when Mamdani’s Department of Finance followed up last week with letters to tens of thousands of homeowners whose primary residence is New York City, demanding payment by August 21, unless they prove a negative by coughing up massive amounts of documentation, including federal tax returns, driver's licenses, voter ID cards, and more if the property is owned by an LLC. These are demands that prove the Democrats’ objections to the SAVE act ludicrous. Due to massive outrage by the targets of the Mamdani administration, by Saturday morning, the deadline was pushed to September 18. The mayor is also threatening a property tax increase to 9.5% for all homeowners.

Some of the progressives who voted for him and believe in redistribution of wealth feel betrayed. An NYU professor appearing on the podcast Pivot sputtered, “He’s taken a legitimate source of revenue and he’s turning it into a wanted poster.”

Suburban homeowners are paying attention. Given the unfolding drama in New York City, it’s reasonable to assume that some demographic groups normally affiliated with the Democrat Party may change their normal voting patterns. They are concerned about mayor’s control over Governor Hochul, with unease intensifying after the DSA’s congressional and state legislature wins in June.

They should. Mamdani’s Marxist ambitions coincide with Hochul’s fixation on building 800,000 new affordable housing units, located mostly near train and bus stations on Long Island and in the northern suburbs.

To further understand the political dynamics, it’s worth recounting some history. The war on suburbia began decades ago, when the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development initiated policies to force affluent suburban communities to eliminate racial disparities by building affordable housing and populate those structures with low-income people of color.

In 2008 under President Barack Obama, HUD was emboldened to focus on Westchester, forcing the county to build 750 affordable units under a federal settlement. When HUD upped the ante and demanded 10,000 new units and an end to local zoning, opposition was so fierce and bipartisan that the county’s voters elected a Republican as County Executive, who stopped HUD’s efforts.

Since her 2022 election, Hochul has been pushing her Housing Compact, which would override local zoning to allow accessory housing throughout the suburbs and high-density housing of 50 units per acre near transportation hubs. Costly infrastructure issues like schools, police, parking, sewers, and traffic are to be borne by the municipalities. The state's Association of Towns and the New York Conference of Mayors were adamantly opposed to Hochul’s attempts to eliminate the state’s constitutionally protected Home Rule for local zoning.

With a Hochul victory in November, the state’s Democrats will accede to the DSA’s demands to decolonize private property and eliminate Home Rule, which has long been a protection against overbuilding.

Outside of Manhattan, homeownership levels in Staten Island and parts of Queens and Brooklyn reach levels similar to the suburbs. For example, in both white and black majority neighborhoods in eastern Queens along the Nassau County line, homeownership percentages are over 70%. The neighborhoods of Riverdale, Douglaston-Little Neck, and Cambria Heights are indistinguishable from their nearby Westchester or Nassau counterparts.

In late 2024, New York City’s Democrats enacted the City of Yes, a zoning law that enabled developers to erect high-density units without any local input. This happened over the near-unanimous objections of community groups in the single- and two-family areas of Queens, Brooklyn, the Bronx. and Staten Island.

It is also worth noting that the DSA is 85% white and skews very young. Hispanic and black homeowners are not buying into their proletarian rhetoric. They’ve achieved or aspire to the American Dream. As one black minister in Westchester’s Mount Vernon put it, “Maybe we have to break the Democrat monopoly.”

Homeownership is not just a white demographic statistic. While white homeownership is 78% and 87% in Westchester and Nassau, according to the U.S. Census. Black homeownership is 39% in Westchester and 74% in Nassau. Hispanic is 69% and 60%, respectively.

Homeownership represents a lifetime of achievement and an invaluable way of creating intergenerational wealth. One’s home is not something to be taken away by elite white Marxists with little life experience. Property rights are worth fighting for because they are the key to America’s economic success and our societal strength.

Republicans statewide and particularly gubernatorial candidate Bruce Blakeman need to loudly champion the values of homeownership and local control over land use as the foundation for making New York great again.

Linda R. Killian is a retired financial executive and a local Republican chairman in Westchester County.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/08/can-homeowners-save-new-york-state-from-socialism/

Sunday, August 2, 2026

Mamdani admin extends $1.86B ‘emergency contract’ for NYC hotels-homeless shelters

 The Mamdani administration re-upped a $1.86 billion contract that will see hotels across the five boroughs provide emergency space for the homeless.

The three-year- contract with the Hotel Association of New York City Foundation, which represents nearly 300 hotels, runs from July 1 of this year through June 30, 2029.

“Over the last 15 years, [the Department of Homeless Services] has faced numerous crises that forced it to rely on commercial hotels to temporarily house clients,” a DHS spokesperson said.

“DHS is focused not only on upholding New York City’s right to shelter but improving outcomes for all the New Yorkers we serve,” the spokesperson added. “As such, we continue to work to transform the city’s shelter system by opening new, high-quality shelters while gradually phasing out the use of commercial hotels for families with children.”

Homeless encampments near Hudson yards and the Javitz Center.Lone Pine Press for NY Post
But the city has to continue to maintain capacity during the transition under “Right to Shelter Laws” which mandate access for anyone seeking shelter in the city. There were 82,929 adults and children in Big Apple shelters as of July 31, according to the department.

“By exercising the renewal option of the agency’s master contract with HANYC, DHS will be able to retain critical hotel capacity, as needed, while we work to bring more traditional capacity online, reduce reliance on hotels, and rightsize our shelter footprint over the coming years,” the spokesperson said.

The hotels will only be activated as shelters if needed and the DHS representative emphasized that the city may not spend the full $1.86 billion allotment.

The city relied heavily on using hotels for emergency shelter to help curb COVID-19 during the height of the pandemic shutdown and continued to utilize the space during a migrant crisis where thousands of asylum seekers were bused into the Big Apple.

About 150 hotels, motels and inns were converted to shelters during the peak of the migrants influx.

A tent set up by a homeless person on 36th street and 11th avenue in Manhattan.Stephen Yang for NY Post

The hotel association said the original contract was finalized in January 2025 after the group beat out dozens of other bidders.

“It is a continuation of HANYC’s well-documented role as a responsible stakeholder since the COVID crisis when the organization moved, pro-bono, over 18,000 people from shelters to hotels on an emergency basis from May 2020 to December 2021,” said Vijay Dandapani, CEO of HANYC.

Meanwhile, DHS awarded two other contracts valued at more than $87 million combined to social service providers as part of its “Integrated Commercial Hotels Program.”

Housing Works was awarded $47.2 million and Neighbors 4 Neighbors $40.28 million to assist homeless individuals and families sheltered in the hotels with their daily needs.

Advocates, like David Giffen, executive director of the Coalition for the Homeless, call hotel use an “unfortunate necessity.”James Keivom for NY Post

Critics have complained that New York City has among the highest hotel rates in the country — and taking thousands of rooms offline doesn’t help make the tourist-reliant metropolis more affordable.

But advocates combating homelessness said the reliance on hotels was an unfortunate necessity.

“The City’s use of hotels to serve as emergency shelters is obviously far from ideal. But given that the City has both a legal and moral obligation to provide shelter to all in need, it must make sure that they have enough beds,” David Giffen, executive director of the Coalition for the Homeless, previously told the Post.

He mentioned that numerous people froze to death on the streets last winter.

“The best way to end the use of hotels is to dramatically reduce the number of people who need shelters in the first place by building more housing that’s actually affordable to the lowest-income New Yorkers,” Giffen said.

https://nypost.com/2026/08/02/us-news/mamdani-admin-extends-1-86b-emergency-contract-for-nyc-hotels-to-serve-as-homeless-shelters/