The measure sought to limit apartment rent increases to 5% or the annual gain in the Consumer Price Index, whichever was lower. The proposal can’t go before voters in November because it includes an exception for religious housing that violates the Massachusetts constitution, the state’s highest appeals court ruled on Tuesday.
Over the weekend, reports surfaced in the press regarding the highly probable acquisition of Arcosa by the Irish industrial giant.
A serial acquirer accustomed to ambitious shifts in scope, and an opportunistic seller when the occasion arises, the cement, aggregates, and building materials specialist CRH has for several years focused its resources and attention on the North American continent.
Initiated with the acquisition of Ash Grove in 2018, the series of transactions in this direction continues at a pace of one major operation per year: Barrette Outdoor Living in 2022, Hydro International in 2023, the Texan cement and concrete assets of Martin Marietta Materials in 2024, Eco Material Technologies in 2025, and now Arcosa.
A subsidiary of the rail group Trinity until 2018, when it was taken public following a spin-off, the Dallas-based group operates two segments: aggregates and electrical infrastructure. Since its listing, it has delivered growth almost entirely driven by acquisitions.
Although its track record has been welcomed by the market, value creation could have been more prolific. This has not prevented Arcosa's current valuation from trading at fifteen times its EBITDA and more than thirty times its net income, multiples significantly higher than those assigned to CRH by investors.
It is worth noting that in 2023, the Irish group, which still generates about a third of its revenue in Europe, moved its primary stock listing to the United States specifically to mitigate a discount it considers unjustified.
This is especially true given that CRH has been an extremely efficient acquirer. Its operating profit has nearly tripled in ten years, with double-digit returns on investment on the $15bn invested in acquisitions.
In parallel, throughout this period, its number of shares outstanding decreased by a fifth due to well-timed share buybacks, while solvency ratios were maintained at a perfectly reasonable level.
This performance is all the more remarkable as it was achieved despite a truly apocalyptic contraction of activity in the Western European construction sector, it further validates the strategy of pivoting toward North America.
The market, however, still grants a clear valuation premium to aggregate pure players such as Vulcan or Martin Marietta. CRH's exposure to Europe and its more diversified platform are perceived here as a disadvantage compared to niche players who control strategic assets.
Recently, investors have shown great enthusiasm for lime and limestone producers, both of which are strategic under new decarbonization standards, and a sector in which quarrying permits have not been issued for a long time.
This is evidenced, for example, by the staggering stock market performance of U.S. Lime & Minerals, or the strong interest from major private equity funds in the Belgian firm Lhoist, which is expected to soon open its capital, until now entirely controlled by the Berghmans family.
There’s a new sound in Pacific Palisades lately.David Buchan for CA Post
The wooden frames of new homes are finally going up.
For weeks after the January 2025 fire, Palisades was a graveyard of chimneys, obelisks mournfully marking the ruins where homes had once stood.
Then the Army Corps of Engineers swept through.
LA Mayor Karen Bass had said it would take 18 months to clear the lots. With President Donald Trump in office, it took less than eight.
Still, there was an eerie silence in town.
The city bureaucracy was slow to approve permits for rebuilding. And some of the insurance companies dragged their feet for months, leaving homeowners desperate for cash.
For weeks after the January 2025 fire, Palisades was a graveyard of chimneys, obelisks mournfully marking the ruins where homes had once stood.Courtesy Sue Kohl
But then, this past January, President Trump decided to get involved.
I personally watched him sign the executive order in the Oval Office in which he took over the permitting processes for the Palisades and Eaton Fire burn zones. (I kept the pen.)
Residents were stunned at the news. Some pointed out that permits were no longer the limiting factor, and that the city had finally begun to get its act together.
But what mattered most was that the president had taken responsibility for the rebuilding effort in a way that no state or local official had done.
Finally, someone was accountable. And there was nothing in it for Trump — no votes, not even a congressional seat to pick up.
He did it because he has friends in the Palisades who — wealthy and successful though they might be — were at their wits’ end.
Bass had once told Trump to stay out of the rebuilding effort — to “handle his business, because we are handling ours.”Pedro Colo for CA Post
But one of my fellow Palisadians, a man named Spencer Pratt, started running for mayor.
And then Nithya Raman, a socialist on the City Council, jumped into the race, unexpectedly.
The mayor suddenly had every incentive to work with the Trump administration — to blunt Spencer’s criticism, and to cast Raman as a risk to the rebuilding effort.
Bass is a poor administrator, but she is good at building relationships. And as luck would have it, she and Zeldin got along when they were in Congress together.
It was democracy at work: With the 2026 elections looming, everyone started pulling in the same direction.
(Everyone except Gavin Newsom, who seems to think fighting with Trump is good for his presidential prospects.)
There are burglars who steal building materials, and even copycat arsonists looking for trouble. REUTERS
We also had to remove the soil, which was contaminated with lead. California’s too good for hazardous waste, so we had to truck it to Arizona, which cost a fortune. And insurance doesn’t cover soil.
My wife used to joke that I should have let the place burn instead of fighting the flames with buckets of water. It would have been simpler.
But when I saw those redwood stud beams in back, exposed for the first time in 76 years, they were as good as new.
No one builds with redwood anymore. We still have it.