A group of landlords in Westchester County on Thursday sued New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo over his executive order extending a moratorium
on evictions during the COVID-19 crisis, saying the measure violated
their contract and due process rights and amounted to an improper taking
of their property under the U.S. Constitution.
The lawsuit,
filed in White Plains federal court, seeks to nullify two provisions of
the May 7 order, which prohibit landlords from pursuing eviction
proceedings through Aug. 19 and give renters the option to put their
security deposit toward their rent payment.
“In doing so, the order has given carte blanche to tenants to
withhold rent without repercussion,” attorney Mark A. Guterman of
Lehrman, Lehrman & Guterman wrote in the 14-page complaint.
“Plaintiffs and all similarly situated landlords are precluded from
asserting their rights and obtaining relief to protect their property,
all the while remaining obligated to pay all of their own carrying costs
and other expenses, including taxes to the various governmental
divisions of New York State,” the filing said.
The lawsuit comes as renters across the state are feeling the squeeze
from the COVID-19 pandemic, which has led to widespread shutdowns and
caused an unprecedented increase in unemployment claims. According to a
recent survey
by the real estate group PropertyNest, 37% of New York City renters
said they would be unable to make rent in June, a figure that had more
than doubled from the month of May.
Cuomo’s order built on a similar measure in March that barred all
commercial and residential evictions through June. It did not cancel
rent payments altogether, and tenants are still responsible for making
up any missed payments to their landlord.
The new order, however, extended the moratorium another two months
for renters who qualified for unemployment benefits or are unable to pay
rent due to the pandemic. Under the order, landlords are also required
to apply tenants’ security deposits to unpaid rent at the request of
renters, though the deposits must be repaid in increments starting 90
days after their usage.about:blank
In Thursday’s filing, the landlords said the order allowed renters to
“unilaterally” violate leases without their consent and prevented them
from using security deposits to recover for damages to their property.
The plaintiffs said they had all signed one-year leases with tenants and relied on the rents as the “sole source” of income.
While the landlords acknowledged that the order was meant to prevent
struggling renters from being evicted, that goal could have been
achieved through “less intrusive” actions, such as permitting courts to
hear each individual case of non-payment on its merits or providing
tenants the means to afford their rent during the crisis.
The order, they said, “creates a palpable and immediate threat to
plaintiffs’ ability to maintain their ownership interest in their
properties and comply with plaintiffs’ own contractual and statutory
obligations by threatening the ongoing stream of rent.”
The governor’s press office did not respond Thursday to a request for comment.
The case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, is captioned Elmsford Apartment Associates v. Cuomo.
https://www.globest.com/2020/05/29/landlords-sue-over-cuomos-order-extending-eviction-moratorium-during-pandemic-296-217972/
No comments:
Post a Comment