Search This Blog

Saturday, August 18, 2018

Office Depot Launches Coworking Pilot, Grows Workonomy Biz Services Platform

Business supply giant Office Depot has continued its push into the experiential with the launch of a coworking pilot program through its business services platform, Workonomy.
Centered largely around small and midsize businesses, Workonomy Hub is an integrated coworking space that recently opened at Office Depot’s Los Gatos, California, store. The workspace gives customers access to a number of services and tools, including access to tech experts for consultations through its tech services kiosks, self-service printing stations and in-store pack-and-ship capabilities.
The company plans to bring Workonomy Tech Services Kiosks to 141 stores throughout Florida, Georgia and Texas by the end of the month.
“With our comprehensive portfolio of services and solutions, and thousands of experts and approximately 1,400 locations, Workonomy provides holistic services for businesses at any stage to help them succeed and grow,” Office Depot Executive Vice President and Chief Services and Solutions Officer Janet Schijns said in a statement.
Office Depot isn’t the only business supply giant experimenting with shared-office space in retail locations. Staples entered a partnership with shared-workspace startup Workbar to open 2,500 SF to 3,500 SF workspaces in three Boston Staples stores in 2016. The deal was meant to help Staples absorb excess retail space, Retail Dive reported.  The Staples-Workbar deal closed around the same time Office Depot’s $6.5B merger with Staples was blocked by the the Federal Trade Commission in early 2016 due to antitrust concerns and to help preserve healthy competition in the office supply market.
In return, Office Depot put forth plans to shutter 300 stores over the course of three years. Office Depot’s portfolio includes 1,400 stores.
The company reported second-quarter sales that beat analyst estimates. Sales increased 11% to $2.6B for the Boca Raton, Florida-based chain, though comparable store sales were down 2%. The retailer continues to underperform the broad stock market, with its stock price dropping 28.8% since the beginning of the year.

Developers Forced Off Chinese EB-5 Funding As Visa Waitlist Balloons

The EB-5 program, for years a reliable source of capital for builders in Miami, New York and other major U.S. cities, has been beset with fraud, long waits and uncertainty.
Chinese investors, who made up 85% of all EB-5 investors, are now facing up to a 15-year wait between the time they file their initial petition and the time they receive a green card.
With such a backlog, developers are turning to investors in other countries — or giving up EB-5 funding entirely.
Thanks to a 1990 federal law that created the EB-5 program, wealthy foreigners can invest $1M in U.S. projects — just $500K in “targeted unemployment areas” — that create jobs and, in return, get green cards for themselves and their family members.
Especially since the Great Recession, Miami has been a magnet for EB-5 money: it is an attractive destination for foreigners, and has plenty of neighborhoods that fit the bill for qualifying projects.
For years, China led the way in EB-5 applicants. Even when the process went smoothly, it could take four years from application to green card. But no country is allowed to receive more than 7 percent of the EB-5 visas offered, and China is the first to reach that cap.
The shift “affects every project everybody’s working on,” said Ronnie Fieldstone, an attorney with Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr who frequently represents developers or the regional centers that help match investors with projects. In his nine years working on EB-5 deals, he has facilitated close to $8B of funding, including deals up to $400M, he said. His major projects include hotels near Miami International Airport and the Paramount Miami condominium.
Although developers gobbled up EB-5 money after the housing crash and the Great Recession when bank lending was sparse, today, Fieldstone said, they don’t need what is commonly called the “cash-for-visas” program.
“The expectations of raising money are less,” he said. “It’s hard to get $200M on a transaction. You could get that three years ago, but it’s very hard today. As China retrogresses, they have been more modest in their requests for capital.”
He said developers he works with are now fanning out to Brazil, Colombia, Europe and the Middle East to solicit investors.
Rodrigo Azpurua, with Riviera Point Development Group, said that he has worked with more than 100 EB-5 investors on five projects since the early 2000s. But nowadays, he doesn’t even bother trying to lure investors with the promise of a green card; rather, he focuses on their desire to invest in low-risk, U.S.-based projects and make good returns.
“My first project was $17M, and I raised half of it with Chinese money,” Azpurua said, speaking of his 72K SF office park in Miramar, which was built entirely with EB-5 funding.
He met potential investors at trade shows and his company showed off its portfolio on social media. He connected mainly with entrepreneurs who wanted to secure visas for their teenage kids to attend college in the U.S. Back then, he said, the waiting period was shorter, so parents were applying when their children were 17.
“Now, it’s when the kids are 2, 3, 4,” he said.
Azpurua has since built a 46K SF office in Doral, a 76K SF corporate center in Miramar, a Radisson Red hotel near the Miami airport and a La Quinta in Orlando, using less EB-5 money each time. His second project was funded with 80% EB-5 money, and his most recent, only about 25%.
Related/Oxford Hudson Yards in Manhattan is the largest mixed-use project in the country, and was financed with hundreds of millions in EB-5 investment dollars.
Azpurua said that although his Chinese investors put their money into South Florida projects, once their their families obtained visas, they mostly chose to live in the Pacific Northwest. Investors from his early projects referred their friends, he said. Many have become disillusioned with long waits for visas, and are forgoing the EB-5 program but investing private equity in his projects anyway, so long as he offers higher returns than they would get with an EB-5 project, which has the value-add of the green card.
Azpurua said banks have eased lending requirements, so he also uses traditional debt to partially finance projects.
The EB-5 program has also seen its share of fraud. In South Florida, one developer was tied to a fraud-ridden Vermont project, Jay Peak, and in early August, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought charges related to the Palm House hotel.
Members of Congress have called for the program’s reform. It has been seen as unfair to offer visas for millionaires, as though citizenship is for sale, while the country struggles to handle refugees who show up at the border, but are poor. Jared Kushner’s family famously was criticized, then investigated, for playing up its ties to President Donald Trump while touting a New Jersey project to potential Chinese investors.
A group of 450 Chinese investors is suing, arguing that the language of the law means that the program should offer more visas, not fewer. The program offers 10,000 visas per year total — which means they go to about 3,000 investors and 7,000 family members. The Chinese argue that the program should award 10,000 visas to investors, plus more for the family members. The current incarnation of the EB-5 program sunsets at the end of September.
“The expectation is that, just like the last 13 or 14 times, it will be extended,” Fieldstone said. “Immigration is a hot button issue, so nobody’s going to tackle this before the election, and nobody’s going to do anything before next year.”
Azpurua said that the constant uncertainty around the program is forcing developers to be less reliant on it.
“Since 2015 there have been these short extensions — 30 days, three months, six months, a year — it has happened several times since 2015 to now,” he said. “All the time, with a new proposed bill, there’s talk about increasing the amount [to be invested], or redefining the employment areas [where jobs must be created]. With all that uncertainty, it’s a great product, but it’s got to make up a smaller portion of the capital stack.”

Friday, August 17, 2018

US regulators target Facebook on discriminatory housing ads

Federal regulators have served Facebook with a complaint alleging the company’s advertising tools allow landlords and real estate brokers to engage in housing discrimination.
Justice Department lawyers disclosed the complaint by the Department of Housing and Urban Development on Friday in a court filing made in a lawsuit brought against Facebook by advocacy groups last spring.
The lawsuit says Facebook’s systems allow people placing real estate ads to exclude certain audiences from seeing them, like families with young children or disabled people.
In its filing Friday, the Justice Department took the side of the advocates, saying the company was enabling advertisers to violate housing laws.
It said HUD served its administrative complaint Tuesday.
A Facebook spokesman says the company doesn’t allow discrimination and has strengthened its systems to prevent misuse.

Dodd-Frank Changes May Up Investment Opportunity In Secondary Markets

In May, Congress approved rolling back regulations put in place for midsize and regional banks after the Great Recession.
Under prior legislation, banks with at least $50B in assets had to undergo stress tests from the Federal Reserve and were prevented from making riskier investments.
The new legislation loosens restrictions on banks with under $250B in assets, improving flexibility for smaller banks and credit unions.
For commercial real estate, the easing of lending regulations could open the door to increased investment, particularly in new construction in secondary markets that institutional lenders had considered too risky in previous years.
“Regional or even community banks, depending on what markets you are in, have traditionally been the funding sources for many boots-on-the-ground developers who would have otherwise been stuck with these tough regulations under Dodd-Frank,” CohnReznick partner Tim Trifilo said. “They will now have more freedom to make their own risk-adjustment decisions on lending. That will have the result of changing many dynamics, including freeing up and having new entrants in those markets.”
The original Dodd-Frank reform law went into effect in 2010, after the bankruptcy of several large banks during the financial crisis.
The reform covers 16 major areas, with the primary objective to prevent banks from exhausting their reserves or lending to unqualified borrowers.
Under the Volcker Rule, banks are limited in the amount of capital they can invest in their own private equity and hedge funds. This includes speculative investment in real estate funds.
Prior to the ruling, Morgan Stanley invested 9% of its Tier 1 capital into its hedge fund, private equity and real estate funds. Goldman Sachs invested approximately 22%.
Increased scrutiny over these investments, CRE experts argue, impacts the securities market by increasing costs for banks to lend, which in turn drives up the cost of loans for borrowers.
Commercial mortgage-backed securities, in particular, have seen reduced liquidity, impacting the availability of mortgage financing for developers of grocery stores, apartments, office buildings and warehouses in secondary markets.
It is in these markets, where a small handful of real estate families and community banks drive development, that Dodd-Frank limited activity.
“Many of those banks have exited that business because of all the regulation and focused on other areas because it was too hard with the interest rate environment to make any meaningful spreads after the cost of compliance,” Trifilo said. “Not to mention the capital requirements they had to follow under Dodd-Frank.”
With the easing of regulations for midsize banks, there is an increased opportunity for investment in secondary and tertiary markets, Trifilo said.
All other sectors of CRE would benefit from having this increased liquidity, and middle markets will now have better access to capital, including foreign investment.
Regardless of the impact that the changes to Dodd-Frank will have on CRE investment trends, there has been a recent resurgence in private real estate funds raising capital for value-add and opportunistic investments.
Private real estate funds raised $33B between January and March, the highest level raised during Q1 since 2008. Institutions in 2017 increased real estate investment by 10.1%, up from 9.9% in 2016, NREI reported.
Industrial, in particular, has become a popular asset class among banks and other institutional investors.
Despite strong activity, concern remains that the market will overheat, and investors should always be cautious to look at investment pro forma and economic outlooks.
“The issues get tricky when you have other markets for loans that may have been made with one institution and then that risk is sold to another institution,” Trifilo said. “That initial judgment of risk was made by an institution that could stand to make more in upfront fees rather than the risk of the loan, and that’s where it gets tricky. ”
Ultimately, allowing banks, investors and financial institutions to make their own judgments on risks will benefit the economy and commercial real estate, Trifilo said.

5 things homebuyers must know about flood insurance

From beachfront condos to landlocked subdivisions, flood zones are everywhere. In fact, almost 41 million Americans live in flood zones, according to a study published in the journal Environmental Research Letter.
Just a couple months into the official start of hurricane season, which runs from June 1 to November 30, many people in storm-prone areas are mindful of the destruction flooding can cause.
Last year served as a major wake-up call in disaster preparedness. Three Category 4 hurricanes made landfall in one season, and Hurricane Harvey broke records for the most rainfall from a U.S. cyclone, measuring 50 inches in some areas. The National Flood Insurance Program, or NFIP, paid more than $8 billion to flood insurance policyholders in 2017 alone.
Here’s five important things homebuyers should know before they buy in a flood zone.

1. You might be required to get flood insurance

Those who live in high-risk flood zones, designated with the letters A or V on a flood insurance rate map or FIRM, are usually required by their mortgage lenders to purchase flood insurance. Flood coverage is separate from standard homeowners insurance.
If you don’t have flood insurance and damage to your home is caused by precipitation, then you’ll likely not be covered by your homeowners insurance policy. Most homeowners insurance will cover water damage from a burst pipe, but not heavy rain, rising rivers or a natural disaster.
Homes located in high-risk zones require an elevation certificate, or EC. The EC shows what your home’s elevation is in relation to how high floodwaters will reach in the event of a major storm. This gives insurance companies an idea of how much risk is involved, which will help determine your premium.
Sellers usually pick up the cost for the EC, which entails a surveyor coming to the property to measure the elevation, says Louise Rocco with Exit Bayshore Realty in Tampa.

2. The NIFP may be on soggy ground

The issue of flood insurance stood out in stark relief in July 2018 when the NFIP was set to expire. The federal program enacted in 1968 helps offset insurance costs for homeowners who are required to purchase flood insurance. Congress passed legislation which was signed by the president, in the eleventh hour, for a four-month extension to the NFIP.
The coverage can be expensive for people in high-risk zones, especially since insurance costs rose 8 percent this year. Premiums through the National Flood Insurance Policy started rising in April, bringing the average annual amount, including surcharges, to $1,062.
In Fremont, Nebraska, where the ground is pancake-flat, many neighborhoods are susceptible to flooding because of extremely slow stormwater runoff. Jennifer Bixby, president of Don Peterson & Associates in Fremont, says residents depend on the NFIP.
“The federal subsidy program is what helps keep flood insurance rates affordable. In Fremont, our citizens pay $1 million alone in flood insurance premiums. If the flood insurance program went away, those premiums would go up. That would impact people’s quality of life,” says Bixby.
For some, the extra money spent on insurance is not worth it.
“A lot of buyers don’t want to spend the money on extra insurance. I know one woman who was paying $5,000 per year on flood insurance. You have to make sure you can afford it and you’re willing to pay it,” says Bixby.

3. If you’re not in a flood zone, you’ll pay less for insurance

Even if you’re not required to get flood insurance by your lender, you still might want to consider it. For homes that are near high-risk areas, insurance could be a lifesaver.
“Flood insurance is a bargain when you consider the potential loss. One foot of water in an average home can cause $72,000 worth of damage,” says Chris Orrock, public information officer with the California Department of Water Resources.
Pro Tip: Don’t wait for an approaching storm to get insurance. Most flood insurance policies have a 30-day waiting period before coverage is activated.
NFIP claims by residents who lived outside of those high-risk zones accounted for more than 20 percent of all NFIP claims filed. These folks received one-third of federal disaster assistance for flooding.
For people not in high-risk flood zones, the cost of insurance is more affordable.
The NFIP’s Preferred Risk Policy program offers low-cost policies for homes that have a low to moderate flood risk. These are designated by B, C, or X zones on a FIRM.
For example, $250,000 worth of coverage, on a house with a basement, costs $386 per year. For a little more than a dollar a day, this could be the best investment you make all year, says Orrock.
Flood insurance rates are based on several factors, according to the NFIP, including:
  • Year of building construction
  • Building occupancy
  • Number of floors
  • Location of its contents
  • Flood zone type
  • Location of the lowest floor in relation to the base flood elevation on FEMA flood map
  • Deductible and amount of building and contents coverage

4. To understand the flood risk, ask before you buy

Experts agree that if it rains, it can flood. In fact, 98 percent of U.S. counties have been impacted by a flooding event. Even one of the driest spots in America, Death Valley, has had dangerous flash floods.
Before buying a home in a flood zone, it’s important to understand how much risk you’ll be assuming.
“One of the reasons people buy in Florida is because they want waterfront property and that waterfront property is always going to be in a flood zone. And even things that they say aren’t in a flood zone still could be. The best course of action is to research the property yourself and ask lots of questions,” says Rocco.
Flood zone information is usually in the MLS listing. Issues like drainage or flooding problems must be disclosed.
“Sellers are obligated to disclose information related to flooding, such as whether or not the property flooded before,” says Bixby.
People who are in the highest-risk areas will pay more for insurance, so this is something to consider when you’re house hunting. Buyers should talk to their lenders about any contingencies associated with buying in a flood zone.
“Some lenders might require you to pay a year’s worth of flood insurance upfront,” says Rocco.

Find out your flood zone designation

Low-risk zones are X and C. Sometimes X zones will be shaded, which indicates that a barrier, like a levy or dam, has been built to reduce the flood risk. Of course, these structures are not a guarantee that flooding won’t occur.
“If you’re protected by a levy, even if it meets FEMA standards, there’s a 25 percent chance during the life of your mortgage, about 30 years, that it will fail,” says Orrock.
A and V = High risk
D = Undetermined risk
B and X (shaded) = Moderate flood hazard
C and X (unshaded) = Minimal flood hazard

5. Investigate flood-proofing retrofitting costs and repairs

If you fall in love with a property, but want to mitigate flood hazards, you can always make changes that will help reduce flood damage. These modifications can be major structural changes or small tweaks, from putting the structure on stilts to adding concrete blocks under your water heater.
Talk to your agent about negotiating the costs of these flood-mitigating updates with the seller.
“You can elevate the building to make sure water isn’t coming in. You can even raise it so that the lowest floor is above flood level,” says Nick Ratliff, associate broker with Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate Cypress in Lexington, Kentucky. “These are things you can talk to your agent about if you’re in a flood zone.”
Depending on your prospective home’s level of risk, small changes can make a big difference. A rule of thumb is to make sure water is flowing away from the home, not gathering in pools.
For example, make sure downspouts are facing away from the structure. Gutter runoff should’t collect near the house, which could eventually cause leaks in your basement. If you see this, address it with your agent or the seller.
“Check the pipes and gutters. Make sure they’re clean. Place air conditioner units on concrete blocks, above flood level. This will help protect your home and appliances,” says Rocco.

New tax law gives rental property owners several breaks, 1 negative change

If you own rental real estate, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) has changes that you need to know about. Most are in your favor. Here’s the story.
Lower ordinary income tax rates for 2018-2025
If you own property as an individual or via a pass-through entity (partnership, LLC treated as a partnership for tax purposes, or S corporation), net income from rental properties is taxed at your regular personal federal income tax rates. Here are the 2018 ordinary income rates and brackets under the TCJA.
singlejointhead of household
10% tax bracket$0-$9,525$0-$19,050$0-$13,600
Beginning of 12% bracket$9,526$19,051$13,601
Beginning of 22 bracket$38,701$77,401$51,801
Beginning of 24% bracket$82,501$165,001$82,501
Beginning of 32% bracket$157,501$315,001$157,501
Beginning of 35% bracket$200,001$400,001$200,001
Beginning of 37% bracket$500,001$600,001$500,001
Long-term capital gains tax rates are unchanged
The TCJA retains the 0%, 15%, and 20% federal income tax rates on long-term capital gains, including long-term gains from real estate. Here are the 2018 rates and brackets for LTCGs.
singlejointhead of household
0% tax bracket$ 0-$38,600$0-$77,200$0-$51,700
Beginning of 15% bracket $38,601$77,201$51,701
Beginning of 20% bracket$ 425,801$479,001$452,401
Exception: As under prior law, you still face a 25% maximum federal income tax rate (instead of the standard 20% maximum rate) on long-term real estate gains attributable to depreciation deductions.
What you can write off is mostly unchanged
As under prior law, you can still deduct mortgage interest and state and local real estate taxes on rental properties. While the TCJA imposes new limitations on deducting personal residence mortgage interest and state and local taxes (including personal residence real estate taxes), those limitations do not apply to rental properties unless you also use the property for personal purposes. In that case, the new limitations could affect deductions for mortgage interest and real estate taxes that are allocable to personal use.
You can still write off all the other garden-variety operating expenses for rental properties: depreciation, utilities, insurance, repairs and maintenance, yard care, association fees, and so forth.
New deduction for pass-through business income
Under prior law, if you had net taxable income from a pass-through business entity (meaning for this purpose a sole proprietorship, LLC treated as a sole proprietorship for tax purposes, partnership, LLC treated as a partnership for tax purposes, or S corporation), the net income was simply passed through to you and taxed at your personal rates.
For 2018 and beyond, the TCJA establishes a new deduction based on qualified business income (QBI) from a pass-through business entity. The deduction generally equals 20% of QBI, subject to restrictions that can apply at higher income levels and a limitation based on your taxable income.
While it is not entirely clear at this point, the new QBI deduction is apparently available to offset net income from a profitable rental real estate activity that you own via one of the aforementioned pass-through entities. The unanswered question is whether a rental real estate activity counts as a business for purposes of the QBI deduction. It probably does, but we await IRS guidance.
Liberalized first-year depreciation for some properties
For qualifying property placed in service in tax years beginning after 12/31/17, the TCJA increases the maximum Section 179 deduction to $1 million (up from $510,000 for tax years beginning in 2017). The Section 179 deduction privilege potentially allows you to deduct the entire cost of eligible property in Year 1. For real estate owners, eligible property includes most improvements to the interior portion of a nonresidential building if the improvement is put to use after the date the building was put to use.
The TCJA also expands the definition of eligible property to include expenditures for nonresidential building roofs, HVAC equipment, fire protection and alarm systems, and security systems.
Finally, the TCJA expands the definition of eligible property to include depreciable tangible personal property used predominantly to furnish lodging. Examples apparently include furniture, appliances, and other equipment used in the living quarters of a lodging facility such as an apartment house, dormitory, or other facility where sleeping accommodations are rented out.
Warning: Section 179 deductions cannot create or increase an overall tax loss from business activities. So you may need plenty of positive business taxable income to take full advantage of the Section 179 deduction privilege. Your tax adviser can help you assess this issue.
100% first-year bonus depreciation for qualified real property expenditures
For qualified property placed in service between 9/28/17 and 12/31/22, the TCJA increases the first-year bonus depreciation percentage to 100% (up from 50%). The 100% deduction is allowed for qualified leasehold improvement property, qualified restaurant property, and qualified retail improvement property.
New loss disallowance rule
If your rental property throws off a tax loss — and most do at least during the early years — things get complicated. The passive activity loss (PAL) rules will usually apply. In general, the PAL rules only allow you to deduct passive losses to the extent you have passive income from other sources — like positive income from other rental properties or gains from selling them. Passive losses in excess of passive income are suspended until you either have sufficient passive income or sell the property or properties that produced the losses.
After you’ve successfully cleared the hurdles imposed by the PAL rules, the TCJA establishes a new hurdle. For tax years beginning in 2018-2025, you cannot deduct an excess business loss in the current year. An excess business loss is one that exceeds $250,000 or $500,000 if you are a married joint-filer. Any excess business loss is carried over to your next tax year and can be deducted under the rules for net operating loss (NOL) carryovers.
A key point: This new loss deduction rule applies after applying the PAL rules. So, if the PAL rules disallow your rental loss, you don’t get to the new loss limitation rule.
Example: You are unmarried. In 2018, you have a $300,000 allowable loss from rental real estate properties after considering the PAL rules. You have no other business or rental activities. Your excess business loss for the year is $50,000 ($300,000 loss minus $250,000 threshold for a single filer). You cannot deduct the $50,000 loss in 2018. Instead you must carry it forward to your 2019 tax year and treat it as part of an NOL carryover to that year.
Variation: If your rental loss is $250,000 or less, you will not have an excess business loss, and you will be unaffected by the new loss limitation rule.
The idea behind this new loss limitation rule is to further restrict the ability of individual taxpayers (like you) to use current-year business losses (including losses from rental real estate) to offset income from other sources — such as salary, self-employment income, interest, dividends, and capital gains. The practical result is that your allowable current-year business losses (after considering the PAL rules) cannot offset more than $250,000 of income from such other sources or more than $500,000 if you are a married joint-filer.
Like-kind exchanges still allowed for real estate
The TCJA still allows real estate owners to unload appreciated properties while deferring the federal income hit indefinitely by making like-kind exchanges, which are also known as Section 1031 exchanges. With a like-kind exchange, you swap the property you want to unload for another property (the replacement property). You’re allowed to put off paying taxes until you sell the replacement property. Or when you’re ready to unload the replacement property, you can arrange yet another like-kind exchange and continue to defer taxes. The TCJA doesn’t change any of this.
The bottom line
The new tax law includes several expanded breaks for real estate owners and one important negative change (the new loss limitation rule, which will not affect very many folks). At this point, how to apply the TCJA changes to real-world situations is not always clear because we have nothing to rely upon except the statutory language.

Thursday, August 16, 2018

Tax Avoidance: Apple Claims HQ Buildings Worth Only $200

Silicon Valley’s largest and most iconic companies are employing armies of lawyers to show that their buildings are worth a lot less than what county tax assessors state.
In Santa Clara County, California, Apple Inc., the United States’ first trillion-dollar company by market capitalization, had 489 open cases dating back to 2004, disputing nearly $8.5 billion in property value, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.
The report notes that Apple is the largest taxpayer in the county, spending $56 million in the tax year 2017-18.
The company has had a long history of tax avoidance. In 2016, the European Union slapped Apple with a $15 billion European tax evasion fine, CEO Tim Cook wrote in an open letter that “in every country where we operate, Apple follows the law and we pay all the taxes we owe.”
As a whole, Santa Clara County has a shocking $76 billion in disputed assessments stemming from property valuations. More than half of the disputes are from ten tech companies, including Apple, Google, Applied Materials and Sun Microsystems.
Tax assessors told the San Francisco Chronicle that, for instance, Applied Materials has 94 appeals totaling $6.1 billion in disputed value and Google has 132 appeals covering $2.7 billion in disputed value.
“These are major cases, and publicly, they kind of go under the radar screen,” said Santa Clara County Assessor Larry Stone, whose office has settled multimillion cases with IBM and Cisco over tax assessments. “How much will a company pay in attorneys’ fees and expert witnesses for a potential payday of $100 million? They’ve spent millions, but there’s millions at stake.”
“The source of many of the disagreements is high-tech equipment, which is more complicated to assess because of complex depreciation rules,” Stone said
“The sophistication of our companies and the complexity of our high-tech industries is different,” Stone added. “Machinery, equipment, computers, fixtures … all the stuff going into (the) Apple spaceship, there’s lots of money inside of it aside from land and buildings. So it can get very complicated.
In one appeal filed in 2015, Apple said its Apple Park in Cupertino was worth only $200, while tax assessors valued the buildings at $1 billion.
According to an appeal application, tax assessors valued another property at $384 million, and in Apple’s view, this one was also worth around $200.
Tax assessors told the local paper that large corporations flushed with cash from Trump’s new tax cut had erected armies of lawyers to wear down county governments.
“The megacorporations have enough resources and money to wear a county down to lower their taxes by appealing, appealing, appealing,” said Gus Kramer, Contra Costa County Tax Assessor.
Apple was a vocal supporter of the GOP tax cuts passed last year that lowered corporate tax rates. The company gained tremendous wealth through lowered repatriation rates that allow it to bring assets from overseas back to the US at a lower tax rate. Since the tax cut, Apple increased the compensation of CEO Tim Cook along with the company’s other top executives and unleashed a $100 billion in stock buybacks.
It seems as the US tax system is fundamentally broken if Apple can value a billion dollars in buildings at roughly $200. Tax avoidance by multinationals has significantly exacerbated the global wealth gap and put excessive burdens on local governments. It seems like Silicon Valley, and mainly Apple, are not paying their fair share of taxes.