Search This Blog

Saturday, September 5, 2026

Squatter nightmare turns DC apartment building into ‘drug haven’ as legal battle drags on

 As Washington, D.C., grapples with a persistent squatting problem, one resident in the nation’s capital is speaking out about how unwelcome tenants have turned her life upside down, terrorizing her neighborhood while the city stands by and does nothing.

“I lived in several countries, including Third World countries, but it seems to me that I’m living in a Fourth World country in D.C.,” Tatyana Day Velasquez, who owns a small three-unit building in Columbia Heights, told Fox News Digital.

“I’ve never seen something like it. There’s no accountability for what goes on. Everybody just throws the ball to each other, and there’s no help. So how can somebody resolve a problem like mine if you don’t get help?”

For a tumultuous eight months, Velasquez said her property’s basement apartment has been overrun by strangers who refuse to leave and live rent-free with no consequences in sight.

As Washington, D.C., grapples with a persistent squatting problem, Tatyana Day Velasquez is speaking out about how unwelcome tenants have turned her life upside down.Fox News Digital/Kiera McDonald

Hidden behind a makeshift barricade built with trash cans and bricks, Velasquez said the apartment has transformed into a “drug haven,” with unfamiliar faces pouring in and out in the night, constant fights breaking out, and a chemical odor seeping through the building. Photos and videos provided by Velasquez show a disheveled apartment littered with needles and drug pipes, as well as Narcan, fentanyl test strips, a machete and guns.

“They don’t pay rent,” she said. “I mean they’re making money by drug dealing, obviously.”

Legal battle drags on

The dispute has since landed in D.C. Superior Court, where Velasquez is fighting to reclaim the basement apartment, arguing the courts are “overfilled with situations like mine.”

Court documents show that Velasquez discovered other people had taken over her apartment after the previous tenant told her he moved out. Despite one of the men claiming the tenant gave him a key, the lease explicitly states unauthorized occupants, subletting and drug-related criminal activity are prohibited.

A DC apartment building has reportedly been turned into a “drug haven” amid an ongoing squatter nightmare and legal battle.Fox News Digital/Kiera McDonald

Three separate tenants ultimately fled and vacated the building amid safety concerns, with one of the tenants telling Velasquez she “no longer feels safe enough to sleep here,” according to court documents.

With the men never receiving approval and not paying rent, Velasquez argued this was enough reason to have them removed from the building.

“How could that be possible?” she said. “They are not guests. They’re not invitees. This property is not a business. So, they are not implied consent to get inside, they are trespassers.”

Police records tell a more complicated story. A June 26 Metropolitan Police Department report said one of the occupants had “established residency” by living with a tenant on the lease and therefore could not simply be removed, so police treated it as a landlord-tenant dispute and made no arrests.

Under D.C. law, property owners generally cannot remove occupants themselves and instead must go through D.C. Superior Court, a process that can take months in some cases. D.C.’s Office of the Tenant Advocate says occupants must be given an opportunity to challenge a property owner’s claims in court before an eviction can be carried out.

A metal tray filled with various drug paraphernalia, including glass pipes and tubes, found inside an apartment.Fox News Digital/Kiera McDonald

“I believe this is predatory tactics, and I also believe that by letting squatters have rights, it’s a violation of the Fourth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment because you no longer have private property,” Velasquez said. “The government decides what your property is going to be used as.”

But the bills never stopped coming, according to Velasquez, including D.C. property taxes and trash violations connected to the debris left behind by squatters.

“I’m not making any income from the property and, as a matter of fact, I’m still being charged taxes from the D.C. government,” Velasquez said.

Cries for help fall on deaf ears

Velasquez has now taken it upon herself to manage the chaos, driving to the building daily to confront the alleged squatters as her cries for help fall on deaf ears.

“I have to go there every day because, you know, I haven’t received much help from the police and the neighbors are tired of it,” she said.

The confrontations with the squatter have turned physical multiple times, according to Velasquez, who said has received pushback from the police over her continued calls reporting the squatter.

“I’ve been assaulted like a couple of times and there’s nothing I can do because I’m responsible for the property and for the safety of other tenants,” Velasquez said.

One neighbor said the incident sends a troubling message about D.C.’s priorities.

A glass door with white writing that reads “So Hot you’ll want to be skinned” and “PLEASE.”Fox News Digital/Kiera McDonald

“You say you want to protect women,” Lloyd, Velasquez’s neighbor, told Fox News Digital. “You’re so against domestic violence, you’re against this and that, but then you turn around and do something like this.”

The disturbances have even spread beyond the property, Lloyd said, with neighbors passing by also being antagonized.

“The way I see it, it’s a domino effect, and it’s an entitled domino effect, and it is an audacity thing,” Lloyd said.

A flawed system

The ongoing legal battle is shining a spotlight on D.C.’s controversial approach to alleged squatters, with property owners left with few options while eviction proceedings play out in court and bills continue to pile up.

Lloyd said the effects of squatting can ripple through entire neighborhoods.

“It’s like one negative thing permeates another negative thing, so you become a fungus in the neighborhood with nuclear waste attached to you,” Lloyd said.

A D.C. police spokesperson told Fox News Digital MPD’s authority is limited once someone has established residency at a property, adding that officers can respond to calls, investigate alleged crimes and make arrests when they find probable cause, but they cannot simply remove an established resident because a property owner considers the person unauthorized.

Despite a recent eviction attempt and arrest, squatters returned; Velasquez’s protective order was dismissed.Fox News Digital/Kiera McDonald

Evictions and questions about possession have to go through D.C. Superior Court, with the U.S. Marshals responsible for carrying out court-ordered evictions. The spokesperson said the underlying problem is largely a matter of D.C. law and that any legislative change would fall to the D.C. Council.

“Squatting is not primarily a housing policy problem; it is a property-rights enforcement problem,” John Gibbs, Director of the Institute for Economic Policy Studies at the Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital. “The core failure is that lawful owners often face greater burdens recovering their property than unauthorized occupants face taking possession of it. The solution is restoring the presumption that ownership matters. Expedited removal procedures, stronger anti-fraud penalties, faster courts, and clearer authority for law enforcement could significantly reduce squatting while preserving protections for legitimate tenants.”

Gibbs pointed to a combination of factors he believes has fueled the growth of squatting in recent years, including the lingering effects of COVID-era eviction moratoriums, which expanded government involvement in landlord-tenant disputes and made removing occupants more difficult and uncertain. He argued those moratoriums helped foster an environment in which occupancy rights were increasingly weighed against property owners’ rights.

Additionally, Gibbs pointed to a growing reluctance among authorities to treat unauthorized occupancy as a property-rights issue, along with changes in policing and prosecution that he said have weakened deterrence. At the same time, he said social media has made it easier for would-be squatters to learn how to exploit eviction procedures, pointing to reports of fake leases, online tutorials and organized schemes that have made the tactics easier to replicate.

A machete, a red object, and clothing on a tiled floor.Fox News Digital/Kiera McDonald

Fox News Digital reached out to multiple members and committees of the D.C. City Council for comment.

The mayor’s office declined to comment.

Last week, the U.S. Marshalls served an eviction at the property, and one of the squatters was also arrested for violating the protective order on the location, but the problem has not been resolved as he and his acquaintances have returned to the property multiple times, Velasquez says. Additionally, Velasquez says her protective order has been dismissed due to clerical errors in the courts.

For Velasquez, the dispute is one of many “horror stories” facing DC property owners that have been reported in local media over the past few years with no resolution in sight.

“These small landlords cannot survive in D.C.,” Velasquez said. “I don’t know what the end game is from the city, but they don’t care about the small guys, the small landlords.”

Fox News Digital reached out to the alleged squatter for comment but did not receive a response.

https://nypost.com/2026/09/05/us-news/squatter-nightmare-turns-dc-apartment-building-into-drug-haven/

Thursday, September 3, 2026

'Mamdani takes victory lap on sale of dead landlord’s derelict buildings, more property ‘transfers’ coming'

 City Hall danced on the grave of a dead Brooklyn landlord who left behind three derelict buildings with over 1,000 property violations – as Mayor Zohran Mamdani took credit for the effort as part of a crackdown of bad landlords of rent-stabilized buildings.

Mamdani took the victory lap in a press release Thursday, announcing the deceased Rubin Dukler’s neglected Crown Heights buildings were sold to a Mark Schwartz, who is planning to remedy the 88 units in close coordination with the Housing and Preservation Department. 

“The tenants of the Dukler Tenant Union have suffered from neglect and disinvestment for years,” Mamdani said in a statement. “Today, a new chapter begins for these buildings.” 

The Mamdani administration helped facilitate the sale of the building by utilizing the HPD’s Alternative Enforcement Program – which targets dilapidated buildings with severe violations. As a result the HPD will have to make emergency repairs at the properties. 0

One osberver said the sale is a “genuine success story” for the buildings’ tenants – who have been organizing against Dukler for years – but warned the move signals Mamdani’s commitment to cracking down on private owners of rent-stabilized buildings. 

“This is a clear signal from the Mamdani administration that chronic neglect is going to be met with escalating enforcement,” said real estate attorney and partner at BlankRome Massimo D’Angelo. 

“And that the city is going to actively work to transfer ownership of these buildings and similar type buildings, you know, from non-compliant owners, and transfer them ultimately to set up tenant ownership,” he said.

Tenants of the buildings had been organizing for years to get emergency repairs fixed.Google Maps

Dukler – who was routinely featured on the Public Advocate’s “worst landlord’s list” – died in 2022, and had a history of open violations on his portfolio dating back to before 2002. 

He sold a 50% stake in his portfolio to Iris Holdings Group for $6.2 million in 2017 – but the sale resulted in a years long legal battle over management and upkeep duties between the two entities, according to previous reporting by Curbed. 

Following his death, tenants were left in limbo for nearly four years without a clear building management structure, and formed the Dukler Tenant Union in 2025 to transfer ownership away from Dukler’s estate. 

The buildings landlord passed away in 2022, and the building was sold to a Mark Schwartz on Wednesday.Google Maps
Now, HPD claims it will continue to work with Schwartz and the building tenants to ensure the new ownership will “adequately invest” in repairs and maintenance. 

“We will work alongside tenants and the new owner to put these 88 homes on a path toward stability and make clear that every New Yorker deserves a safe, well-maintained and stable place to call home,”  Mamdani said.

https://nypost.com/2026/09/03/us-news/mamdani-takes-victory-lap-over-sale-of-dead-landlords-derelict-buildings-as-expert-warns-more-property-transfers-coming/

Wednesday, September 2, 2026

NYC’s biggest builders circling $360M vacant lot that could become city’s next supertall

 A long-stalled Upper East Side development site once envisioned as the home of a 1,000-foot-plus skyscraper is back up for grabs — this time with a $360 million price tag.

The six-parcel assemblage at 143-161 E. 60th St., directly across from the Bloomingdale’s flagship and steps from Lexington Avenue, last traded for $300 million in 2015.

Now, more than a decade later, the seller is seeking $60 million more for the roughly 20,000-square-foot site, which offers about 283,000 square feet of development potential.

Bloomingdale’s flagship sits directly across from the $360 million development site.vacant – stock.adobe.com

And unlike the last time the property changed hands, the old buildings that stood on the lot are now gone, leaving developers with a cleared site and a rare chance to make their mark on the Manhattan skyline.

The property’s zoning allows for residential or commercial development and, crucially, has previously been marketed as allowing a tower without a height limit — opening the door for a future developer to once again shoot for the sky.

Manhattan’s skyline could get another 1,000-foot-plus addition if the long-stalled East 60th Street site is finally developed.Paul Martinka

But buying the dirt could be just the beginning of the bill.

Listing broker Marlon Schwarcz estimates that developing a high-end project on the site could require roughly $500 million on top of the land acquisition.

“Usually, you look at 2 times from whatever the acquisition price is” as a typical indication of the capital needed for a project, Schwarcz said. “Now, for the ultra-luxury, you go 3 times the original acquisition.”

At the $360 million asking price, that could put the overall investment needed for an ultra-luxury project in the neighborhood of $1 billion.

At the other end of the spectrum, Schwarcz said the site could be developed as affordable housing, which he estimated could cost roughly $100 million to $300 million to build.

Some of New York’s biggest builders are already circling.

Schwarcz said he has received offers from major developers, including players with projects on nearby Billionaires’ Row.

Billionaires’ Row developers are among those eyeing the $360 million Upper East Side site, according to the listing broker.Christopher Sadowski

“I can’t say the names,” he said. “But what I can tell you, it’s top 10 — often people that are doing projects on Billionaires’ Row.”

Offers began arriving roughly 30 days after the property hit the market, he said, and Schwarcz believes a deal could be reached within about 90 days.

A decade of sky-high ambitions

Chinese developer Kuafu Properties bought the six-property assemblage from World Wide Group for $300 million in 2015, when its low-rise buildings included the longtime home of the beloved Subway Inn, which had been forced to relocate as redevelopment plans took shape.

Kuafu, led by Shang Dai and Zengliang “Denis” Shan, had much bigger ambitions for the corner.

The developer commissioned prominent architecture firms to dream up competing visions for the site — several of which could have extended the supertall boom that transformed Billionaires’ Row northeast toward Lenox Hill.

Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners devised a 62-story, 1,000-foot residential tower in 2015, with a slender glass design rising above a retail base. Kohn Pedersen Fox later produced its own potential supertall concept as part of a private design competition, envisioning an exceptionally slender tower broken up by a series of setbacks and cutouts.

Archilier Architecture proposed perhaps the most audacious version: a roughly 1,240-foot tower with an inverted-taper design that widened as it rose, putting its largest floors — and prized Central Park views — near the top. At that height, it would have ranked among New York’s tallest residential skyscrapers.

A 1,000-foot-plus tower on East 60th Street could bring Billionaires’ Row-style heights to the Upper East Side.Paul Martinka

None made it off the drawing board.

The project then became tangled up in a shakeup at Kuafu. In 2016, the Real Deal reported that Shan was leaving the development firm to launch his own venture, with the East 60th Street site among the projects going with him.

The assemblage ultimately ended up under Shan-controlled Sumi Properties.

The sheer amount of money required to build on the site helps explain the challenge facing any developer hoping to finally turn those sky-high ambitions into reality.

Nearby 432 Park Ave. offers a glimpse of the kind of supertall development once envisioned for the East 60th Street site.Robert Miller

“If you don’t have enough investors that want to invest alongside with you, everything is on your shoulders,” Schwarcz said. “Regardless of how wealthy you are or how big you are, it’s very unlikely you’re going to accomplish this development.”

Years of work have nevertheless changed the property dramatically since its last sale. The six buildings have been demolished, leaving the assemblage cleared and ready for its next act.

The six buildings at 143-161 E. 60th St. have been demolished, leaving the $360 million site cleared for development.Google Maps
The seller, meanwhile, isn’t desperate to make a deal.

“It all comes down to numbers,” Schwarcz said.

https://nypost.com/2026/09/01/real-estate/nycs-biggest-builders-are-circling-a-360m-vacant-lot/